ROSEN Mailing List Archives (by thread)

• Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems, (continued)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems - James N Rose (Sun Mar 28 16:49:30 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems - Tim Gwinn (Sun Mar 28 21:04:02 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems - James N Rose (Sun Mar 28 22:10:34 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems - Tim Gwinn (Mon Mar 29 15:34:52 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems - John M (Mon Mar 29 17:02:16 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems - James N Rose (Tue Mar 30 06:44:25 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems - James N Rose (Tue Mar 30 15:06:25 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems - John M (Tue Mar 30 16:25:17 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems - John M (Sun Mar 28 16:51:20 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems - Tim Gwinn (Sun Mar 28 21:29:33 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Comparing Rosennean Complexity - John Kineman (Thu Mar 25 21:04:11 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Comparing Rosennean Complexity - Tim Gwinn (Wed Mar 24 16:30:26 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Comparing Rosennean Complexity - John M (Wed Mar 24 21:42:20 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Comparing Rosennean Complexity - Tim Gwinn (Wed Mar 24 22:48:34 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Comparing Rosennean Complexity - John Kineman (Thu Mar 25 01:22:47 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Comparing Rosennean Complexity - John M (Wed Mar 24 22:47:30 GMT 2004)
    • Re: [ROSEN Ways of defining Rosennean Complexity - Judith Rosen (Thu Mar 25 13:03:05 GMT 2004)
    • Re: [ROSEN Ways of defining Rosennean Complexity - John Kineman (Thu Mar 25 21:20:05 GMT 2004)
    • Re: [ROSEN Ways of defining Rosennean Complexity - Judith Rosen (Thu Mar 25 22:40:51 GMT 2004)
    • Re: [ROSEN Ways of defining Rosennean Complexity - John Kineman (Fri Mar 26 15:46:14 GMT 2004)
• Correct URL - Howard Pattee (Mon Mar 22 16:01:09 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Correct URL - John Kineman (Mon Mar 22 23:36:08 GMT 2004)
• The writing of "Life, Itself and "Essays..." - Judith Rosen (Mon Mar 22 13:43:45 GMT 2004)
• Hilary Lawson - Closure: A Story of Everything - Tim Gwinn (Sun Mar 21 16:47:50 GMT 2004)
• Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - Howard Pattee (Sun Mar 21 04:02:18 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - Judith Rosen (Sun Mar 21 04:24:18 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - John M (Sun Mar 21 16:46:02 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - Judith Rosen (Sun Mar 21 15:15:52 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - Tim Gwinn (Mon Mar 22 02:15:13 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - John Kineman (Mon Mar 22 19:21:48 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - Howard Pattee (Sun Mar 21 04:18:15 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - Howard Pattee (Mon Mar 22 12:02:56 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - John Kineman (Mon Mar 22 19:31:45 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - Howard Pattee (Mon Mar 22 15:16:36 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - Tim Gwinn (Mon Mar 22 16:50:24 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - John Kineman (Mon Mar 22 19:57:52 GMT 2004)
      • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - Judith Rosen (Mon Mar 22 21:15:18 GMT 2004)
        • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - John M (Mon Mar 22 22:28:14 GMT 2004)
        • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - John Kineman (Tue Mar 23 02:36:08 GMT 2004)
      • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - John M (Mon Mar 22 21:35:18 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - Howard Pattee (Tue Mar 23 01:23:03 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - Howard Pattee (Tue Mar 23 01:45:41 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - Howard Pattee (Tue Mar 23 01:53:15 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life - John Kineman (Wed Mar 24 00:24:23 GMT 2004)
• Life without evolution/evolution without life? - Howard Pattee (Sat Mar 20 15:22:37 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - James N Rose (Sat Mar 20 18:48:00 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - Judith Rosen (Sat Mar 20 21:04:10 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - John Kineman (Mon Mar 22 19:07:57 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - John M (Mon Mar 22 23:10:46 GMT 2004)
      • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - John Kineman (Tue Mar 23 02:49:33 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - Howard Pattee (Sat Mar 20 21:30:04 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - Judith Rosen (Sun Mar 21 03:35:55 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - James N Rose (Mon Mar 22 05:56:17 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - John Kineman (Mon Mar 22 19:11:02 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - Howard Pattee (Mon Mar 22 22:28:41 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - Howard Pattee (Tue Mar 23 14:12:40 GMT 2004)
    • Re: What is real? - Judith Rosen (Tue Mar 23 15:36:44 GMT 2004)
      • Re: What is real? - Ayten Aydin (Tue Mar 23 19:02:36 GMT 2004)
        • Re: What is real? - Judith Rosen (Wed Mar 24 03:26:32 GMT 2004)
          • Re: What is real? - Ayten Aydin (Wed Mar 24 17:11:23 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - Howard Pattee (Tue Mar 23 17:45:00 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - Tim Gwinn (Tue Mar 23 18:08:09 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - Judith Rosen (Tue Mar 23 18:11:40 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - John Kineman (Wed Mar 24 04:16:08 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - John Kineman (Wed Mar 24 04:24:55 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - Judith Rosen (Wed Mar 24 12:26:29 GMT 2004)
      • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - John Kineman (Wed Mar 24 14:32:19 GMT 2004)
• Re: Relational space - Howard Pattee (Sat Mar 20 00:03:13 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - Judith Rosen (Sat Mar 20 03:00:51 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life? - Tim Gwinn (Tue Mar 23 16:22:49 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Relational space - James N Rose (Sat Mar 20 18:39:28 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Relational space - John M (Sat Mar 20 22:26:01 GMT 2004)
      • Re: Relational space - James N Rose (Sat Mar 20 23:36:41 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Relational space - John Kineman (Mon Mar 22 18:54:42 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Relational space - Howard Pattee (Mon Mar 22 22:17:47 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Relational space - John Kineman (Tue Mar 23 00:39:05 GMT 2004)
• folding problem - Howard Pattee (Fri Mar 19 01:05:15 GMT 2004)
  • Re: folding problem - Judith Rosen (Fri Mar 19 04:37:22 GMT 2004)
• protein folding and relational space... - Judith Rosen (Thu Mar 18 22:31:20 GMT 2004)
  • Re: protein folding and relational space... - Tim Gwinn (Fri Mar 19 00:10:35 GMT 2004)
• FW: Relational "Space" - Ulanowicz works - Tim Gwinn (Thu Mar 18 18:43:09 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Relational "Space" - Ulanowicz works - John M (Thu Mar 18 21:26:27 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Relational "Space" - Ulanowicz works - Dan Fiscus (Thu Mar 18 22:10:15 GMT 2004)
      • Re: Relational "Space" - Ulanowicz works - Tim Gwinn (Fri Mar 19 14:59:50 GMT 2004)
        • Re: Relational "Space" - Ulanowicz works - John M (Fri Mar 19 19:40:10 GMT 2004)
        • Re: Relational "Space" - Ulanowicz works - Dan Fiscus (Fri Mar 19 19:40:14 GMT 2004)
        • Re: Relational "Space" - Ulanowicz works - John Kineman (Fri Mar 19 23:01:39 GMT 2004)
          • Re: Relational "Space" - Ulanowicz works - Tim Gwinn (Mon Mar 22 03:36:46 GMT 2004)
          • Re: Relational "Space" - Ulanowicz works - Tim Gwinn (Tue Mar 23 14:06:52 GMT 2004)
          • Re: Relational "Space" - Ulanowicz works - John Kineman (Wed Mar 24 04:30:14 GMT 2004)
• Does anyone have this paper - Jannie Hofmeyr (Thu Mar 18 10:31:22 GMT 2004)
• Protein Folding/ Complexity plus reductionism = ? - Judith Rosen (Wed Mar 17 17:52:51 GMT 2004)
• Fw: Nature is Quantum, Really - Judith Rosen (Tue Mar 16 16:12:51 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Nature is Quantum, Really - Tim Gwinn (Tue Mar 16 21:10:10 GMT 2004)
• Re: A paper of Robert Rosens that may be of interest - Tim Gwinn (Tue Mar 16 02:25:38 GMT 2004)
• Rosennean ideas and better modelling... - Judith Rosen (Sat Mar 13 14:55:46 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Plain txt - was: Rosennean ideas and better modelling... - John M (Sat Mar 13 16:04:00 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Rosennean ideas and better modelling... - James N Rose (Sun Mar 14 02:03:16 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Language expression; html vs plain text - Judith Rosen (Sun Mar 14 03:37:47 GMT 2004)
      • Re: Language expression; html vs plain text - James N Rose (Sun Mar 14 04:07:52 GMT 2004)
      • Re: Language expression; html vs plain text - Tim Gwinn (Sun Mar 14 10:41:14 GMT 2004)
• Horizontal scrolling - Athel Cornish-Bowden (Fri Mar 12 13:17:53 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Horizontal scrolling - Ayten Aydin (Fri Mar 12 14:25:08 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Horizontal scrolling - John M (Fri Mar 12 15:23:38 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Horizontal scrolling - Judith Rosen (Fri Mar 12 20:59:13 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Horizontal scrolling - Athel Cornish-Bowden (Fri Mar 12 14:46:57 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Horizontal scrolling - Tim Gwinn (Fri Mar 12 16:05:48 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Horizontal scrolling - Ayten Aydin (Sat Mar 13 08:38:23 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Horizontal scrolling - Athel Cornish-Bowden (Fri Mar 12 16:28:58 GMT 2004)
• You have misunderstood my intentions - Judith Rosen (Thu Mar 11 13:58:26 GMT 2004)
  • Re: You have misunderstood my intentions - Jack Park (Thu Mar 11 14:40:11 GMT 2004)
• Another excerpt on Modelling - Judith Rosen (Thu Mar 11 12:53:43 GMT 2004)
• Medical science and Rosennean Complexity - Judith Rosen (Thu Mar 11 12:40:59 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Medical science and Rosennean Complexity - Jack Park (Thu Mar 11 13:32:38 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Rosennean Complexity, real models/needs - Dan Fiscus (Thu Mar 11 14:29:38 GMT 2004)
      • Re: Rosennean Complexity, real models/needs - Jack Park (Thu Mar 11 14:49:01 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Medical science and Rosennean Complexity - Tim Gwinn (Thu Mar 11 16:29:02 GMT 2004)
      • Re: Medical science and Rosennean Complexity - Dan Fiscus (Thu Mar 11 18:53:32 GMT 2004)
        • Re: Medical science and Rosennean Complexity - Jack Park (Thu Mar 11 20:07:54 GMT 2004)
        • Re: Medical science and Rosennean Complexity - Tim Gwinn (Thu Mar 11 20:56:57 GMT 2004)
          • Re: Medical science and Rosennean Complexity - John M (Thu Mar 11 23:28:10 GMT 2004)
        • Re: Medical science and Rosennean Complexity - Judith Rosen (Fri Mar 12 03:00:16 GMT 2004)
  • A question on style of writing... - Judith Rosen (Thu Mar 11 13:37:35 GMT 2004)
    • Re: A question on style of writing... - Tim Gwinn (Thu Mar 11 14:08:09 GMT 2004)
• Applications of Rosennean Complexity Theory (modelling) - Judith Rosen (Thu Mar 11 04:52:08 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Applications of Rosennean Complexity Theory (modelling) - Jack Park (Thu Mar 11 06:13:49 GMT 2004)
• The value of Rosennean Complexity, applied... - Judith Rosen (Wed Mar 10 20:46:13 GMT 2004)
  • Re: The value of Rosennean Complexity, applied... - John Kineman (Wed Mar 10 23:21:07 GMT 2004)
    • Re: The value of Rosennean Complexity, applied... - Judith Rosen (Thu Mar 11 00:01:01 GMT 2004)
      • Re: The value of Rosennean Complexity, applied... - Tim Gwinn (Thu Mar 11 01:44:33 GMT 2004)
        • Re: The value of Rosennean Complexity, applied... - John Kineman (Sat Mar 13 01:44:54 GMT 2004)
        • Re: The value of Rosennean Complexity, applied... - John Kineman (Sat Mar 13 01:51:30 GMT 2004)
          • Re: The value of Rosennean Complexity, applied... - Tim Gwinn (Sun Mar 14 02:53:07 GMT 2004)
          • Re: The value of Rosennean Complexity, applied... - John Kineman (Mon Mar 15 14:39:27 GMT 2004)
          • Re: The value of Rosennean Complexity, applied... - Tim Gwinn (Mon Mar 15 19:42:18 GMT 2004)
• Re: modelling metabolism - Judith Rosen (Fri Feb 27 18:06:37 GMT 2004)
  • Re: modelling metabolism - Jannie Hofmeyr (Mon Mar 01 07:06:00 GMT 2004)
    • Re: modelling metabolism - Tim Gwinn (Mon Mar 01 16:17:03 GMT 2004)
• Re: Triple-J ; OnLine Cell Modelling (JWS) - Jannie Hofmeyr (Fri Feb 27 08:36:19 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Triple-J ; OnLine Cell Modelling (JWS) - James N Rose (Fri Feb 27 15:11:01 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Triple-J ; OnLine Cell Modelling (JWS) - Jannie Hofmeyr (Sun Feb 29 11:47:17 GMT 2004)
• Life Itself in paperback....soon? - Tim Gwinn (Fri Feb 27 01:34:42 GMT 2004)
• Re: The Santa Fe Institute - Judith Rosen (Sat Feb 21 17:50:30 GMT 2004)
  • Re: The Santa Fe Institute - James N Rose (Sat Feb 21 23:20:55 GMT 2004)
  • Re: The Santa Fe Institute - Tim Gwinn (Sun Feb 22 02:34:26 GMT 2004)
    • Re: The Santa Fe Institute - Jack Park (Sun Feb 22 04:13:27 GMT 2004)
      • Re: The Santa Fe Institute - Tim Gwinn (Sun Feb 22 15:18:45 GMT 2004)
  • Re: The Santa Fe Institute - Judith Rosen (Sun Feb 22 10:39:45 GMT 2004)
• Re: Guide to Life Itself - Judith Rosen (Sat Feb 21 00:23:14 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Guide to Life Itself - Ayten Aydin (Sat Feb 21 10:08:50 GMT 2004)
• Re: Landauer and Bellman critique - Jannie Hofmeyr (Thu Feb 19 21:23:13 GMT 2004)
  • Guide to Life Itself - Tim Gwinn (Fri Feb 20 02:37:46 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Guide to Life Itself - Kevin de Laplante (Fri Feb 20 21:50:31 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Landauer and Bellman critique - Judith Rosen (Sat Feb 21 07:08:24 GMT 2004)
    • after the: Landauer and Bellman critique - James N Rose (Sat Feb 21 16:39:04 GMT 2004)
• Paper by Landauer and Bellman - Jannie Hofmeyr (Wed Feb 18 21:23:02 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Paper by Landauer and Bellman - Kevin de Laplante (Wed Feb 18 22:31:01 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Paper by Landauer and Bellman - Tim Gwinn (Thu Feb 19 01:07:01 GMT 2004)
      • Re: Paper by Landauer and Bellman - Tim Gwinn (Thu Feb 19 04:33:32 GMT 2004)
        • Re: Landauer and Bellman critique - Dan Fiscus (Thu Feb 19 14:19:55 GMT 2004)
          • Re: Landauer and Bellman critique - Tim Gwinn (Thu Feb 19 18:39:00 GMT 2004)
        • Re: Paper by Landauer and Bellman - Tim Gwinn (Wed Feb 25 18:46:12 GMT 2004)
          • Re: Paper by Landauer and Bellman - John M (Wed Feb 25 22:15:35 GMT 2004)
          • Re: Paper by Landauer and Bellman - Tim Gwinn (Thu Feb 26 02:42:22 GMT 2004)
          • Re: Paper by Landauer and Bellman - John M (Thu Feb 26 16:54:03 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Fw: Paper by Landauer and Bellman - Judith Rosen (Sun Feb 22 10:30:55 GMT 2004)
    • Re: Fw: Paper by Landauer and Bellman - Tim Gwinn (Mon Feb 23 00:52:44 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Paper by Landauer and Bellman - Jannie Hofmeyr (Thu Feb 26 04:36:48 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Paper by Landauer and Bellman - Judith Rosen (Thu Feb 26 11:52:37 GMT 2004)
    • Triple-J ; OnLine Cell Modelling (JWS) - James N Rose (Thu Feb 26 15:01:30 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Paper by Landauer and Bellman - Jannie Hofmeyr (Thu Feb 26 20:03:51 GMT 2004)
• Physical Church's Thesis on FOM - Tim Gwinn (Mon Feb 16 14:11:36 GMT 2004)
  • explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Dan Fiscus (Mon Feb 16 15:32:26 GMT 2004)
    • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Jack Park (Mon Feb 16 15:54:57 GMT 2004)
      • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Dan Fiscus (Mon Feb 16 16:21:55 GMT 2004)
    • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Tim Gwinn (Mon Feb 16 20:11:52 GMT 2004)
      • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - John M (Mon Feb 16 21:24:21 GMT 2004)
        • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Tim Gwinn (Tue Feb 17 01:37:21 GMT 2004)
          • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - John M (Tue Feb 17 16:06:01 GMT 2004)
          • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Tim Gwinn (Tue Feb 17 16:32:49 GMT 2004)
          • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - John M (Tue Feb 17 22:21:18 GMT 2004)
          • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - John Kineman (Tue Feb 17 20:41:34 GMT 2004)
          • What is Life/Living? - ISSS - John Kineman (Tue Feb 17 20:52:13 GMT 2004)
          • Re: What is Life/Living? - ISSS - Judith Rosen (Wed Feb 18 03:18:41 GMT 2004)
      • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Kevin de Laplante (Mon Feb 16 22:13:24 GMT 2004)
        • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Tim Gwinn (Tue Feb 17 01:07:25 GMT 2004)
          • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Kevin de Laplante (Tue Feb 17 18:31:30 GMT 2004)
          • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Tim Gwinn (Tue Feb 17 20:40:27 GMT 2004)
          • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Tim Gwinn (Wed Feb 18 17:05:50 GMT 2004)
          • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Kevin de Laplante (Wed Feb 18 22:29:55 GMT 2004)
          • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Pete Giansante (Fri Feb 20 00:47:06 GMT 2004)
          • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Tim Gwinn (Fri Feb 20 01:47:31 GMT 2004)
        • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Dan Fiscus (Tue Feb 17 13:16:45 GMT 2004)
          • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Tim Gwinn (Tue Feb 17 16:34:22 GMT 2004)
          • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Kevin de Laplante (Tue Feb 17 18:43:09 GMT 2004)
          • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Tim Gwinn (Wed Feb 18 13:19:06 GMT 2004)
          • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Tim Gwinn (Mon Feb 23 21:02:30 GMT 2004)
          • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement? - Tim Gwinn (Sun Feb 29 16:55:13 GMT 2004)
          • Re: Relational "Space" - Tim Gwinn (Tue Mar 16 15:57:38 GMT 2004)
          • Re: Relational "Space" - Judith Rosen (Tue Mar 16 16:07:22 GMT 2004)