Re: Intelligent Design vs. Darwin

[James N Rose <***>]

notice to the list ..
 
I apologize if my last few postings seemed
derogatory of David.  'tweren't meant that
way.

I was more perseverating from my concern
that to achieve success in getting across
Rosenean type ideas its going (to my thinking)
to take a different vocabulary and scope
of herding ideas, to waken stilted traditional
scientists (let alone the larger population
of faith-based people concerned with preserving
confidence in miracles and information which
'passes all understanding' ie - all that is not
and could never be 'science' even though valid
and considered real beyond question) to come into
an as strong appreciation for the reality and truth
of Rosenean ideas.

This is a strong and durable and open forum
that allows such kind a writing/talking, because
its founded on understanding one of the earliest and
most complete proponents of this new epistemology.

For whatever reasons he was hampered and resisted
during his lifetime, we further those efforts and 
have the chance to carry to success what he 
achieved .. and devotedly initiated.

Anyway .. sorry Dave if I came off too strong.
Didn't mean anything coarse or mean at you.

Jamie