Re: Silly questions?

[David Macy <***>]

Jerry,

    I can hear you and it warms my heart.

I don't understand everything about RR's works either.  I'm trying to
though.

On the automobile:  I guess we must be talking about different things.  No
problem though, we'll just mark it as some sort of oddity and come back to
it later.  Maybe under the list heading of: Automobiles and Semantics.

I'm glad you had a good Sunday break.

Cheers
David


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jerry Zhu" <***>
To: <***>
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: Silly questions?


> Hi Judith and David,
>
> First of all I don't have odds with RR's work.  I
> don't pretend to understand RR to have odd with. I had
> RR's Life Itself and skimed it.  There are a whole lot
> of RR's work I don't know. I just has some odds at
> Judith's views some times.
>
> By the way I said automoble and David keep saying
> automobile. Are we talking different thing?
>
> It was a good Sunday break even a bit lazy.
>
> Have a good new week.
>
> Jerry
>
>
>
>
> --- Judith Rosen <***> wrote:
>
> > Jerry Zhu wrote: Why not themselves antificipate?
> > Second law operates
> > > that is the ever increase of entropy.  Automoble
> > means
> > > self movable objects that could be an automobile
> > or an
> > > animal.  Obviously they both anticipate.
> >
> > Jerry; either you have some really unique
> > definitions of anticipation
> > or you are very much at odds with Robert Rosen's
> > work. Come to think of
> > it, you have a really unique definition of
> > "self-movable object" too. I
> > would say that automobiles are "human-movable
> > objects" but they don't
> > do anything by themselves. They are designed for
> > interaction. Humans
> > are the anticipatory system in the equation. Cars
> > are simple systems.
> >
> > Judith
> >
> >
> > Web address: http://www.rosen-enterprises.com
> > BioTheory: An electronic journal of general science
> > based on the
> > Relational (Rosennean) Complexity Paradigm
> > On Oct 9, 2005, at 3:24 PM, Jerry Zhu wrote:
> >
> > > --- David Macy <***> wrote:
> > >
> > >>> Yo no soy un poeta, Rodrigo!  Soy demasiado
> > tanto.
> > >>
> > >> Jerry Zhu wrote: Does an automoble anticipate?
> > >>
> > >> Did you ask this of the void?  Was it rhetorical?
> > >> We could just talk about questions!!!  I would
> > say
> > >> that automobiles are built in anticipation, but
> > of
> > >> course they themselves do not anticipate.
> > >
> > > Why not themselves antificipate? Second law
> > operates
> > > that is the ever increase of entropy.  Automoble
> > means
> > > self movable objects that could be an automobile
> > or an
> > > animal.  Obviously they both anticipate.
> > >
> > > Jerry
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Music Unlimited
> Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
> http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/