Re: the "(M,R)-System" model, Modeling relations, and semantics

[null null <***>]

John M. wrote:
> 2. to JR:
> To consider time or change as the ultimate 'original'
> is your preferential right (and mine as well). I feel
> we have more 'insight' into the better identifiable
> (conceptual?) change than the elusive time and you may
> expose yourself to questions about this fundamental
> and 
> - as you wrote:
> > > of time; the co-organized nature of space and time
> > > in our universe are 
> > > an integral aspect of the fabric of all things/all
> > > existence. <
> which is so different according to the speed you
> travel with (Einstein). So not 'all times' are equal
> either.
Of course not. That's clear to me as well. As RR put it: Time is complex.
And, as I said, whatever aspects of time we are able to perceive or experience; they are not really "time" but rather the effects of time on space and on matter, as all are organized into the same universe. In a certain sense everything is an effect.

Judith