|
Hey Rodrigo,
Otra vez, mi equivocacion.
Mi espaniol y primo con nombres es como en defectuoso tortuga. Your
english is much superior to my spanish, as well as your ability with
names. I'm am in need to learn for other reasons, but you give me impetus
as well.
This that you have sent....
“This work describes the qualities and implications, in the field of
psychology, of two principles which can be observed in the physical and
biological world: the principle of entropy and the principle of
syntropy. The description of the qualities of entropic and syntropic phenomena can be found in the works of Luigi Fantappiè, one of the major Italian mathematicians, who, while working on quantum mechanics and special relativity, discovered that all physical and chemical phenomena, which are determined by causes placed in the past, are governed by the principle of entropy, while all those phenomena which are attracted towards causes which are placed in the future (attractors), are governed by a principle which is symmetrical to entropy and which Fantappiè named syntropy.
...I find interesting. Fantappie' while trying to understand quantum phenomenon and relativity feels that he has arrived at that which pertains to mind? I feel that I am far from able to veiw things from a physicist's perspective, but I can't help but be interested in such interesting claims. I really can't pretend to even understand Schroedinger's Cat. I wonder if this is similar.
Can Fantappie's insights pertain to the establishment of organisms or minds? This part about, "causes which are placed in the future", does this not pertain to the -impredicativities- that Robert spoke of and Tim has most recently reminded me of? I may need to add some of Fantappie' in addition to some of Rene' Thom to my reading time.
When I lean on previous intuition about thermodynamically open and closed systems, I think, if it's closed then any potential inherent in the system will be expended sooner or later. If it's open then creation can continously happen anew, caveat if it's a -steady flow- open then it seems there may be limits (perhaps describable) within which new creation can take place. If the system is just generally open then all bets are off and anything can happen, limited only by as yet unknown natural law. Something like that.
Interesting stuff. Gracias Rodrigo.
David
|