[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index

Re: The difference between organism and ecosystem...



Excellent post, Dan! Without intending to trivialize what you said, it seems like you're simply arguing the traditional positive/negative feedback balance that has been the mainstay of cybernetics and the "edge of chaos" guys. I worry that boiling it down to a binary system (like auto- and hetero-trophism) is going too far; but, there's plenty of evidence that coercing qualia into false dichotomies is cognitively useful. You gotta start somewhere!

I have just one clarifying comment/question:

Dan Fiscus wrote:
This thread gets more fun and wild when we consider
that humans could decide to try to "prove" but more
like assert or actualize that syntropy is greater than
entropy if we set as our goal to establish life beyond
our solar system. If we succeed, it would seem to
demonstrate that the organizational capacity of the
universe (physical and life/non-physical) is greater
than the 2nd law tendency. And by extension over
turn the doctrine of the 1st and 2nd laws as being
supreme over things that are non-conserved and
non-entropic, like life, love, the mind, ideas,
information, creativity...etc...

The 2nd law only relates to isolated systems. There's no law against a process increasing order in a given locale (presumably at the expense of order in the whole in which that locale sits) if the process is connected to other systems (with order to spare). So, establishing life elsewhere in the solar system would only establish that we are capable of creating order in a given local (or, more appropriately, moving order from one locale to another). And, since this order-motion would, presumably, give off unstructured and un-harnessable energy, the total order in the whole system should decrease.


Or have I misunderstood you?


-- glen e. p. ropella =><= Hail Eris! H: 503-630-4505 http://ropella.net/~gepr M: 503-971-3846 http://tempusdictum.com