|
Hi Steve,
Interesting reading, thanks for posting it!
SJ wrote: There are some comments with respect
to
cryogenics in Kampis pointing out that if we are able to revive animals from a frozen state this would be a remarkable revelation about the nature of life. Namely, that all the information about the "graph" or "causal loop" that represents life is contained purely in the relations between components and none in the momenta of the particles. I have to ask... Is Kampis saying that the relations between
physical parts are all that matter? If he is, then I think
his view might have gone too far the other way from reductionism-- and
extremes are never good. They also tend to be almost identical to each
other. Just as one can end up on the west coast of the United States
by flying East, and vice versa, I think it's possible to commit a
reductionist act by trying too hard not to. In this case,
I think he may be equating total organization with relations
and relegating the material structure to being "that which is
organized". If so, that's not how my father conceptualized it. He was
being facetious when he said "throw away the matter and keep the organization".
(That's because he knew that by keeping the organization, you keep the matter,
too-- but it doesn't work the other way). The physical structure of any material
system is part of total organization, just as the relations and the
interaction of space and time are... No organizational aspect is
fractionable.
On the subject of cryogenically freezing and reviving organisms...
I've been wondering what aspects of organization are affected by the temperature
drop. It's a well-documented phenomenon that living processes "slow down" when
temperatures drop and "speed up" when temperatures rise, within certain
parameters. That's why food in the refrigerator stays unspoiled far longer than
it does sitting on a picnic table at 90 degrees F. In a sense, time and
temperature are linked. So, if science finds a way to cryogenically freeze
living organisms such that their organization is maintained (no ice crystal
damage in all body cells, etc) then the only thing that has been changed is
time, and it cannot be "stopped", it can only be slowed. The tricky part will be
the process of putting a living system into this state and the process for
pulling them back out of it. I tend to suspect that, even if they do succeed in
developing such a technology, there will be health consequences associated with
it. In the experiment they took all the blood out of dogs and replaced it
with strong saline solution, prior to freezing.... Hmmmm..... That doesn't sound
good... strong saline can do a lot of damage to body tissue, not to mention
throwing off all the electrolytes in the body, even after they drained the
saline and reintroduced the blood. It sounds awful!
I wonder how much research has been done into comparing the various
modes actual living organisms use to survive extremes? There are creatures which
can, and do, have the resources to naturally survive radical fluctuations
in environmental conditions, like desiccation or being frozen, and suffer
no damage. I can't remember if I mentioned the "waterbear" before on this list?
If I have, forgive the redundancy-- The waterbear, also known as Tardigrada:
(Cute, isn't he?)
There are something like 400 species and probably a zillion of
them can be found in your yard right now; they live all over the planet,
including the poles. When they are dehydrated they go into a condition
called cryptobiosis and then they can withstand all sorts of deadly
forces and extremes, including radiation, heat, cold, different atmospheric
pressures and absence of atmosphere, etc. There are lots of websites on
these creatures, easily found via google. Here's one:
I first learned of these creatures watching "Nature's Most Extreme
Animals" with my youngest daughter (a show on the Animal Planet channel). I'd
never heard of them, and they are fascinating for several reasons. For example,
they are microscopic and yet they are multicellular, articulated animals. Nifty.
I'd be studying cryptobiosis if I was interested in developing cryogenic
technologies..... my instinct is that we ought to stay as close to nature as we
can on this.
Judith
|