Re: Robert Rosen's working notes...

[Ayten Aydin <***>]

Thanks Judith,

Very subtle reflections on the question I raised. Hence, we may safely
acknowledge that Nature has the equilibrium as its ultimate goal to be
achieved by negotiating inherent complexities therein. This again reminds us
the importance and validity of mimicking the Nature in all life and living
matters.

A question to all: Have Rosen's genotype and phenotype definitions something
to do with this female-male complementarity issue?

Ayten

----- Original Message -----
From: "Judith Rosen" <***>
To: <***>
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 7:17 AM
Subject: Re: Robert Rosen's working notes...


> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm down in Virginia on a business trip right now but finally able to
retrieve my email.
>
> Ayten's comments and questions on comparisons between male and female
brains
> (or  between male and female "anything") are of interest in several ways
with
> regards to issues Rosennean Complexity addresses.
>
> On the one hand, I think that-- in the same way that the chicken and the
egg entail
> each other-- any species which has two genders, it can be said that each
gender
> entails the other. I think each also has the other encoded within it, just
as the female
> body has, say, the nutritional needs of an infant encoded; these are all
aspects of the
> "internal predictive models" that are discussed in Anticipatory Systems.
It's a little
> tricky to discuss some of these aspects on a public forum because it could
easily
> degenerate  into either camp or overtly sexual terms that some are bound
to find
> offensive. However, I think it's important to point out that the term
"anatomically
> correct for each other" infers a great deal of information that must be
encoded about
> anatomy which the OTHER gender possesses. I've heard the male body
described, by
> a famous male author whose name escapes me at the moment... as "a delivery
> system" which externalizes everything. I asked my father, who was alive at
the time
> that article came out, whether he would agree with it, and he said
basically he did.
> What it means, I think, is that the male body has the information encoded
within it
> that the female body internalizes.
>
> So, while I think it's generally true that most female human brains can
multi-task
> much more easily than most human males, for example, and males can rotate
> images three-dimensionally in their minds with much greater ease... I
think that such
> differences are not "accidental". I think that the genders have certain
aspects about
> each other encoded and I also think that they (the genders) differ for a
reason.
> I suspect the reason has something to do with "complementarity".
>
> Web address: www.rosen-enterprises.com
>
>