|
Tim,
thanx for the note. I take it from the
ubiquitous silence (as experienced to many of my notes to this list about
model- and redux-related topics) about the details I wrote that they are not
objected to. Which gives me a big relief. I use common sense and my own
understanding. I want to better understand RR, but that does not mean any
planned conversion of mind, only a consider-able maybe.
*
BTW your other post (explanatory to the list):
Consider accepting some (not hostile, but
scientifically well crafted) disagreements to RR-ideas as well. Here, the
listers, well versed in Rosenism would know how to address those, better than
let them just harangue in places where many did not even hear the RR
name.
*
Third (to reduce your
cost<G>):
I agree with Arno, I did not find 'that kind'
hostility in Pattee's writings either. But, I didn't have the background and the
sensitivity for such either (like eg. Judith).
John M
----- Original Message -----
|