[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index

Re: Reductionist philosophy



Howard,
 
Again you are skewing the point.  The point is not the topic of his opinions, but mischaracterizations. I have had enough.
   
    - Subscription revoked -
 
Tim
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ROSEN Forum [mailto:*** Behalf Of Howard
> Pattee
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 12:54 AM
> To: ***
> Subject: Re: Anticipatory Systems
>
>
> Tim,
>
> I will cease discussing Rosen's opinions of other scientist's motives and
> models, fair or not. I can see that it is not an acceptable topic
> for your
> list.
>
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: ROSEN Forum [mailto:***On Behalf Of Tim Gwinn
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 4:59 PM
To: ***
Subject: Re: Reductionist philosophy

Howard,
 
HP:As I said in my post beginning, I was expressing irritation at Rosen's labeling entire fields of science, whole classes of scientists as well as individual scientists as "reductionists" and criticizing their research strategies. My only point was to suggest that such labeling should not be propagated on Tim's list.  
 
TG: As listowner, I am far more concerned with your continued attempts to propagate mischaracterizations of Rosen on this list. Again and again, you have seeked to paint him as something he is not, pulling quotes and partial quotes out of context and attempting to draw caricatures about his character.
 
In your previous post, to seriously ask "why not?" as you did, in regard to the positions of Rutherford and Hutchins that you referenced, I can only conclude that either you have not actually read "Life Itself" or that you have little or no understanding of the book, since that was such a fundamental point. As Judith said, your portrayal entirely missed the point of his comparison.  In either case, with that apparent lack of understanding of the very beginning of the book, you are in no position to characterize on this list the man who wrote the book.
 
My patience is about at an end, and there is too else much worth discussing on this list to waste time on these tiresome mischaracterizations. Subscriber status is granted or revoked on this list at my whim, and I am feeling mighty whimsical right about now.
 
Tim