Problems for solutions

[Tim Gwinn <***>]

 

I am of the mind that clearly thought-out approaches and solutions require clearly thought-out and stated problems. No science, and certainly not this list, can solve an ill-defined or vague problem.

 

I agree that it is not useful to simply bash the inadequacies of reductionist paradigm modalities. Likewise, it is not useful to bash the Rosennean paradigm for not solving vague or general problems. The precision and detail that is expected when posing a problem in contemporary science is no less required when posing a problem in the Rosennean paradigm.

 

Regards,

Tim