Re: Quantum Physics

[Steve Johnson <***>]

JZ:
> There is no evolution inside an atom since no
> symmetric breaking. Inside an atom there are
> interconnections of interconnections and no
> interconnection is more fundamental than the other.
> Our understanding of it depends on what is in our
> mind.

SJ: Our understanding of *anything* depends on what is
in our mind. One of the main points of Rosen's
approach is that we cannot make any assetions about
how things *really* are we can only build models. 

JZ:

 At the subatomic level, the
> system is neither simple nor complex. There is no
> things inside only tendency to exist.  it is
> statistic
> system of potentiality governed by nonlocal
> variables.

SJ: All these statements are based on just one of our
models, namely, Quantum Mechanics. You're implicity
according it a higher ontological status in saying
that  that's the way things "really" are at the
microscopic level. There is no reason for doing so as
QM is just another model.

- Steve  

--- Jerry Zhu <***> wrote:

> Judith said "an atom is a complex system"
> 
> I disagree with this.  At the subatomic level, the
> system is neither simple nor complex. There is no
> things inside only tendency to exist.  it is
> statistic
> system of potentiality governed by nonlocal
> variables.
> There is no evolution inside an atom since no
> symmetric breaking. Inside an atom there are
> interconnections of interconnections and no
> interconnection is more fundamental than the other.
> Our understanding of it depends on what is in our
> mind.
> 
> Jerry 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 



                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250