[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index

Re: Inequivalence of models



James Rose wrote:
Car= mobile container
an entity may have a majority usage (one final cause; transporter)
but it can also have other 'final causes' which include
all possible use/application of the nature of its components
-and- compounded/emerged aspects.
cars have served as 'homes', beds for lovers, ambulances,
changing rooms, delivery rooms & operating rooms, eating rooms
it can also be thought of as a self-contained self delivery system ..
which eventually drives itself to a recycling center where its
composition can be de-structured for other uses .. having subsequent
other 'final causes'.
Yes, but then it's not "a car". Cars were designed for a purpose, and their organization reflects the purpose, but the purpose comes from outside the system called "car". To change the use, which as you noted happens rather often, is sort of like the "change-of-function" that my father described in evolutionary processes in biology. "Re-purposing" a car, though, isn't evolution as far as the car is concerned: the entailment structures are all externally derived.
 
Most cars make lousy beds for lovers-- lousy delivery rooms... lousy changing rooms... lousy homes. And the main reason is because cars were not designed for those functions. Most of the entailment has to do with transportation and the body shape this is usually accomplished in is folded ("sitting"). (Which probably explains why cars are not too bad for eating in!)
 
But, again, when a car is re-purposed like that, it's not anything about the car that's making it happen, it's about the human need to put a car to other uses. When a hermit crab uses a dead snail's leftover shell as a "house", that has almost nothing to do with the snail anymore (and it's certainly not about the snail's evolution)-- it's about the hermit crab and ITS requirements/entailment-relations/etc.
I think it's also worth reiterating the concept of "chimera" that was discussed at length in most of Robert Rosen's books. I tend to conclude, based on that, that all human-created machines are really "sub-systems" of a larger chimerical system: human being plus technology/tool. Unlike the snail shell that the hermit crab repurposed (which will reveal nothing about the hermit crab's use of it once the crab outgrows it and moves on to a new shell), a car has all its original entailments intact and this makes using machines (which human beings create for our own purposes) very bad "models" for natural systems in general.
 
Judith