Re: Inequivalence of models

[James N Rose <***>]

Car= mobile container


an entity may have a majority usage (one final cause; transporter)

but it can also have other 'final causes' which include
all possible use/application of the nature of its components
-and- compounded/emerged aspects.

cars have served as 'homes', beds for lovers, ambulances,
changing rooms, delivery rooms & operating rooms, eating rooms 

it can also be thought of as a self-contained self delivery system ..
which eventually drives itself to a recycling center where its
composition can be de-structured for other uses .. having subsequent
other 'final causes'.

The nature of a systemic theory which goes beyond the conventional
brings just this expansion of relations to our immediate awareness.

The nature of a discussion which rises to the spirit of the awarenesses
inherent in the superior systemic theory also has to raise the bar of
dicussed relations, and keep to the expanded ideal of the new comprehension.

If the effort is to put emerged properties back into the box of 
pre-emerged qualia, that would be quite a waste of words.  Relations
-do exist- between pre-emerged and post-emerged qualia, but no amount
of de-/re- formation of an oak tree with 'just make' an acorn.

No amount of re-wording RRosen will produce perfect synchrony with
Aristotle or any other conventional paradigm of science.

If the attributes 'immediately presenting' in an acorn - in the moment
of its being - is inadequate to express all the potentia of a fully
emerged oak tree, then how can anyone except 'standard science' verbage
and thought to be adequate to expressing the vision, totality, and
nuances of a fully expressed and expanded systemic theory of process/being?

It is what it is, and must be taken on its own terms.

Jamie Rose
Integrity Paradigm
friend in spirit with Robert Rosen
Jan 19, 2005