[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index

Thinking about the Rosennean challenge



My friend, Tom Munnecke, gave two links in another forum on the web. They are:

http://www.orgnet.com/BuildingNetworks.pdf
and
http://www.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/netgroup.htm

I see some connections between these two URLs and the challenge Judith poses to this community. The connections are based, I think, on the notion that we, here, are busy taking on the physics community, when, at the same time, others are already doing things that are intrinsically, and intensely relational in nature, and without benefit of any ideas about what is the core subject of this forum. I strikes me that the road ahead lies more in the ground-breaking science, or lack of it, that is now the web, the communities (read: organisms) forming on that web, and in the learning opportunities that arise within and between those communities.

I think that I am suggesting that the time has past to attempt to enlighten physists (if, indeed, that is necessary, sufficient, or even a logical goal one might place on a challenge). Rather, I think, the time has come for the arguments and the technology, which one imagines Rosennean Complexity to embrace, to be taken, in a down and (not too) dirty, hands-on fashion, to an environment in which the nature of entrenched sensibilities has yet to mature. In the spirit of emergence, I think the rest will take care of itself.

Jack