|
Tell you what, if you guys want to create a foundation, all
chipping in (so that I could earn a salary while doing the work)...or if
you want to get together and apply for a grant to fund it (so we could ALL
get paid while doing the work) then I'LL do it. I'm the logical person to create
this "study companion"/glossary/cookbook/topicmap because I'm a writer, I'm a
Rosen, and I inherited all the copyrights. This is something I actually intend
to do over the next few years, as well as a biography of my Dad, but money is a
constant, gnawing problem. I wouldn't have been able to do as much as I've done,
except I was funded from outside by someone who admires Robert Rosen's work, but
that person's resources are finite, too and he's done so much already I won't
ask him for anything more.
So if the funding problem could be worked out such that I'd be
helping pay some family bills, I could devote a lot more time to projects like
the one you guys are suggesting. If we were able to secure enough funding for a
Robert Rosen Foundation or a BioTheory Institute or whatever, you folks could
all work on spin-off applications.
Judith
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 12:19
PM
Subject: Re: [ROSEN] Modeling vs.
Simulation [from "fundamental problems in physics"]
What we need is the Rosen TopicMap, maybe built as a wiki, a
kind of
wikipedia for Rosennean Complexity.
Jack
John M
wrote:
>Tim,
>may I repeat the nth time: instead of writing
345 times at length about "as
>Rosen defined..." to identified different
views occasionally,
>WHY NOT COMPOSE THE ROSEN-GLOSSARY?
>It would
take time and effort, but would be economic vs. the desultory
long
>explanations repeated on and on. Short and - if - based on quotes
from RR
>last version writings. (Earlier versions may have been
changed).
>
>John M
>----- Original Message
-----
>From: "Tim Gwinn" <***>
>To: <***>
>Sent:
Monday, December 20, 2004 10:42 AM
>Subject: Re: Modeling vs. Simulation
[from "fundamental problems in
>physics"]
>
>
>
>
>>JohnK,
>>See interposed
comments.
>>Regards,
>>Tim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From:
ROSEN Forum [mailto:*** Behalf Of
John
>>>Kineman
>>>Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004
2:44 PM
>>>To: ***
>>>Subject:
Re: Modeling vs. Simulation [from "fundamental problems
in
>>>physics"]
>>>
>>>
>>>Tim,
Howard,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>SNIP 400 lines
>
>
>
>
|