Re: Modeling vs. Simulation [from "fundamental problems in physics"]

[Jack Park <***>]

What we need is the Rosen TopicMap, maybe built as a wiki, a kind of 
wikipedia for Rosennean Complexity.

Jack

John M wrote:

> Tim,
> may I repeat the nth time: instead of writing 345 times at length about "as
> Rosen defined..." to identified different views occasionally,
> WHY NOT COMPOSE THE ROSEN-GLOSSARY?
> It would take time and effort, but would be economic vs. the desultory long
> explanations repeated on and on. Short and - if - based on quotes from RR
> last version writings. (Earlier versions may have been changed).
>
> John M
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Gwinn" <***>
> To: <***>
> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 10:42 AM
> Subject: Re: Modeling vs. Simulation [from "fundamental problems in
> physics"]
>
>
>  
>
> > JohnK,
> > See interposed comments.
> > Regards,
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >    
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ROSEN Forum [mailto:*** Behalf Of John
> > > Kineman
> > > Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 2:44 PM
> > > To: ***
> > > Subject: Re: Modeling vs. Simulation [from "fundamental problems in
> > > physics"]
> > >
> > >
> > > Tim, Howard,
> > >
> > >      
> SNIP 400 lines
>
>
>