Re: Modeling vs. Simulation [from "fundamental problems in physics"]

[John M <***>]

Tim,
may I repeat the nth time: instead of writing 345 times at length about "as
Rosen defined..." to identified different views occasionally,
WHY NOT COMPOSE THE ROSEN-GLOSSARY?
It would take time and effort, but would be economic vs. the desultory long
explanations repeated on and on. Short and - if - based on quotes from RR
last version writings. (Earlier versions may have been changed).

John M
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Gwinn" <***>
To: <***>
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: Modeling vs. Simulation [from "fundamental problems in
physics"]


> JohnK,
> See interposed comments.
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ROSEN Forum [mailto:*** Behalf Of John
> > Kineman
> > Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 2:44 PM
> > To: ***
> > Subject: Re: Modeling vs. Simulation [from "fundamental problems in
> > physics"]
> >
> >
> > Tim, Howard,
> >
SNIP 400 lines