[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index

Re: Fundamental problems in Physics



 
>H.P. wrote: Here is the crucial question: Do you believe that living systems at any level of complexity or organization can violate or evade physical laws? I meant natural laws as expressed by the models of today's physics.
 
Ah, well that's different. Today's physics is still based on laws ("Physical Laws") that are not entirely "congruent" with Natural Law/s. So while I believe that all systems, including living systems, behave in ways consistent with natural laws of the universe, I do not think Physics has accurately figured out what most of those laws are. I also think my father was right about the fact that Physics has misinterpreted a substantial number of basic attributes of the universe. So, words like "violate" or "evade" are inapplicable when it comes to "laws" that aren't really laws.
 
Judith

----- Original Message -----
To: ***
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [ROSEN] Fundamental problems in Physics

At 02:51 PM 12/17/04 -0500, Judith wrote:
>H.P. wrote: Here is the crucial question: Do you believe that living
>systems at any
>level of complexity or organization can violate or evade physical laws?
>Judith: I interpret "physical laws" to mean "Natural Laws". If that's what
>you mean, I already answered that question in my post yesterday morning:

HP: I'm sorry, I'm not sure your answer was a "Yes" or a "No. I meant
natural laws as expressed by the models of today's physics.

Howard