[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index

Re: Models and ecosystem balance/change...



Steve Johnson wrote:
So what entails the organization? The genome + the
environment?

That particular question is THE question. How do these systems spontaneously form? How do atoms coalesce and self-organize? My father's answer to that question was; "Nobody knows." He said that the epistemology of complex systems tells us nothing about their ontology, and he was investigating their epistemology. All he would venture to say was that "It is the nature of this universe to do so (spontaneously self-organize into ever more complex systems)."
 
As far as the genome goes... he was uncharacteristically harsh on what a waste of money it was to focus on mapping the genome. He felt it was setting science back at a time when we can scarcely afford to wait to expand our notions of how systems are what they are and how we approach learning about them. That's not to say that genes aren't important, but they are not all there is to making an organism. He used the example of protein folding to show that genes only code for the protein sequence, but in order for the protein to become active, it has to fold into a "tertiary" shape, which proteins in living systems spontaneously do. But how? That's the kind of thing that needs looking into. The shape has to be exactly right or it won't be able to do what it's supposed to do. What guides this process? Even the genetics of an organism at the cell level... how do they arrange themselves in order to reproduce? That's apparently not coded for. And how does the mitochondrial DNA fit in? What specifies the intracellular communication system? And what is "junk DNA" (sequences of code that don't seem to encode anything)? Science has more questions than answers and yet we're busily engineering the genetics of all sorts of organisms, including microbes. Pretty scary!
 
One of the applications of my father's work that needs a whole lot more research is to try and figure out what information is encoded into our "internal predictive models". I'm hoping that launching BioTheory will spur some of that kind of research over the next couple years. I've been puzzling over it myself and I've got quite a list put together so far, which will be in my paper. I think that knowledge about these internal models is going to be important for our survival as a species over the course of this century.
 
Judith