|
Judith,
A picture is worth more than 1000 words -
especially if it is an Escher. Thanks.
I think you missed my point; - there is no
what?
it is not science's task to prove that "there is
no God", it is the other side's task (and obligation!) to prove that there is.
Then we can ponder THEIR evidences and REPLY positively even if it is a negative
reply. This is how the argument goes.
I leave the Inquisition alone: I live in the 3rd
millennium.
However: you could have mentioned the killing of
MDs and bombing of abortion clinics. Not all fiundamentalists are meek.
All those biologists! they (I mean the
fundamentalist Christians)
think and speak about 'human life' that, indeed,
begins at conception, but provide only much later a human person. Is the
genom's/embryo's biology (=life process) their fetish? I asked
(on another list) "who aurhorized the geneticist
to order God to provide a soul for the artificial or cloning fertilization
mixture?"
Isn't it only authorized as the Church
prescribed it (meaning the 'misiionary' way)?
Have a good one
John |