[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index

The short-attention-span version



John M.
 
You asked for "short and to the point", right? I'll give it a try.
 
Rosennean Complexity Theory:
 
1. Rosennean Complexity Theory is a foundational set of ideas that amount to a new scientific paradigm based on organization rather than on particulate matter.
 
2."Based on organization" means based on the causal impact that organization has on the behavior and properties of any given system as a whole.
 
3. Organization implies relationships, which in turn imply contexts.
 
4. Of all the types of organization that exist, the ones we can observe seem to fall into certain categories, and the categories fall into two main groups: Simple organization and Complex organization.
 
5. Simple organization allows a reductionist approach without loss of information. Simple does not mean "simplistic" or "uncomplicated", on the contrary; simple systems can be very complicated and intricate. In this usage, "simple" has a very specific meaning, as stated, above. Simple systems are systems in which the causal impact of their organization is not the main feature and/or the effects of interfering with their organization are completely reversible.
 
(Note: There are other diagnostic tests, which my father developed for both #5 and #6, but I won't list them here because that would kill the "short and to the point" quality that was requested.)
 
6. Complex organization does not allow a reductionist approach without loss of information. Depending on the type of complex organization involved, varying degrees of information are lost if the organization is interfered with or dismantled. Complex organization cannot be re-established in a system once it has been dismantled.
 
7. Complexity is a word that refers to the impact of organization but it is not a quality that can be measured "by a meter", as my father put it. It's not just "more complicatedness". Therefore, complex organization cannot be arrived at by adding simple systems together (accretion). This is true even though we speak of a single celled organism being "more complex than" an atom, and a multicellular organism being "more complex than" a single celled organism, etc. An atom is already complex in its organization, and it spontaneously self-organized that way via modes or laws that are part of what my father called "Natural Law".
 
8. Because Natural Law creates complex systems, Complexity can be seen as a general property of this universe.
 
9. Because complex systems (atoms) are the "smallest building block in all material things", Complexity should be studied intensively by any science that wants to consider itself "general".
 
That's about as short as I can make it for you.
 
Judith Rosen