|
Tim,
as I emphasize the "MY" it means simply
that it is my opinion, not necessarily matching the general
usage.
If you exaggerate 'dualism', I think you are in
danger of falling into solipsism. (There is a long and multidsciplinary
discussion on the Journal of Consciousness Science Online, mostly philo-and
psych- about solipsism and I would not like to fall into it. )
(Of course there is also a lot to it what has
been said at again another list that a "unit" implies at least two.
)
Do you negate any "1st person" interpretation?
Do we have direct access to the totality of nature? Is personal experience
irrelevant? Or are you complacent in dualism?
Semantics (the relational study of symbols)
slips easily into syntax (the relational study of symbol
relations).
John M
|