[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
 
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
List Issue: Dual Archives
- From: Tim Gwinn <***>
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:33:38 -0400
To
all,
When I originally
set up the list, I enabled the archiving of list messages on Lsoft's server.
This was a quick and painless way to have a searchable archive of list posts.
These are the archives located here:
But, I saw three
problems with this archive:
1) Cost - As time
goes on, I have to buy more archive space from Lsoft, and I will have to keep
paying for it over the years to maintain them.
2) These archives
were not being indexed by search engines like Google, so the archival "value"
was not really being used.
3) Lsoft provides
no way to hide or mask users email addresses. This means that spam merchants
could potentially harvest email addresses from these archives. This might make
some folks who try to keep their email address private hesitant to post.
Some months ago, I
created the archives that are located on my website. This is done
utilizing some Perl freeware, and has been used for some extremely large
archives. These are the archives located here:
The benefits
are:
1) Hides email
address of posters.
2) It uses
diskspace I was already paying for.
3) It is
searchable with Google, etc.
4) Somewhat
customizable layout.
My question is
this: Would any one object to, or think of a reason not to, disable the
Lsoft-based archives? Is there some value or importance there that I am
missing?
One
other option I have would be to maintain the status quo storage on Lsoft,
and simply delete the oldest monthly archives as time goes on to keep
the diskspace from filling up. At the current rate, I imagine the space
would hold roughly the latest 18 months of archives comfortably.
But I
wonder if this might not end up being needlessly confusing by having partial
archives in one location (Lsoft) and complete archives elsewhere; hence, the
thought that I might as well just shut off the Lsoft
archives.
Tim