[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index

Re: Anybody?



Judith, I would be happy to 'matchmake', but I don't know YOUR applicable e-mail address either: both list (Listserve) have the "courtesy" of marking NAMES for FROM instead of e-mail addresses (as do some other listservers). I tried several times to send you some off-list post but could do it only with a technical somersault: reply to the list and erase the list address as well as the list-text - then write my in private parts.
Buck just wrote: he found on Google Tim's website stating:
--"I plan to read more of it." -
So it is imminent to give something less professional and more palatable than Tim's "real" RR-text.
The original response from Buck was:
> From: "Buck Lawrimore" <***>
"Thanks, John. (I think :-) Maybe it will Rosenate with me :-)
Buck"
(He presides to his own well establihed company in econo-marketing studies and mgmnt consulting).
 
I don't want to be involved further, however (maybe) I also could use some 'layified' info on Rosenism <G> for my education.
What's your working personal e-mail address (if not secret)?
 
John M


 
----- Original Message -----
To: ***
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: Anybody?

Hi John M.
 
I would be happy to talk to Buck. Would you give him my email and ask him to write me? You don't have his email listed on this post or I would consider writing directly to him.
 
As it happens, I have had several economists get in touch with me from around the planet this year so far. Apparently, in doing searches on both complexity and social systems science, they managed to find my father's work. Trying to forecast the behavior of various sectors in global economic systems was driving each one of them to look for more "scientific" modes of analysis. Because complex organization was my father's "diagnosis" of the general nature of systems in this universe, and because complex organization has enormous similarity across type of system (meaning that organization and behavior of complex systems is not dependent on what the parts are made out of), my father's work is the lone beacon that is based on principles that hold up to both logic and common sense. I have already put economists on my "list" of professions which are in dire need of a "translation" of some of my father's writings. They are in good company with medical personnel, computer systems specialists, and political scientists, among others. One of the things I'm working on are "reading guides" to my father's work, geared towards each of the discipline areas on my list. I'm hoping that the combination of getting my father's original works back in accessible form and offering companion writings of my own that make the original works more absorbable will help.
 
Judith
 
 
 
 
 
Judith