[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index

Re: Question, version 2



Tim,

I don't think I get your drift - can you say more?

Are you saying that Langton's "can be separated from"
is different from Rosen's "keep the organization and
throw away the matter"? I mean, I think the two have
big differences when these comments are seen in total
context of their full works. But I am not sure what you
are asking/saying...

Dan

Tim Gwinn wrote:
Dan, John,

Look at the quotes again. Think about the difference between building models
of some material system versus the notion that "the ‘logical form’ of an
organism can be separated from its material basis of construction". In
particular, what does the phrase "can be separated from" mean?

Regards,
Tim

snip


Langton’s and other’s view of Artificial Life is that they also want
to get beyond particular material realizations of life. Langton says:
“Of course, the principle assumption made in Artificial Life is that
the ‘logical form’ of an organism can be separated from its material
basis of construction, and that ‘aliveness’ will be found to be a
property of the former, not of the latter.” (Artificial Life,
Langton, ed., Addison-Wesley, 1989, p.11.)