Dear Judith, You will find attached a note with some excerpts from Wilber's book which I hope give you some hints on what you are looking for and perhaps trigger an interest to read the whole book. My best Ayten ----- Original Message ----- From: "Judith Rosen" <***> To: <***> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 5:26 AM Subject: Re: What is real? > Hi Ayten, > > Can you give me a quick paraphrase of what Wilber's book is about? What is > his take on a definition for reality? > > Thanks! > Judith > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ayten Aydin" <***> > To: <***> > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 1:15 PM > Subject: Re: [ROSEN] What is real? > > > > Judith, > > In connection with your questions, I find Ken Wilber's book "Eye to Eye" > > very enlightening. > > Aydin > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Judith Rosen" <***> > > To: <***> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 5:36 PM > > Subject: Re: What is real? > > > > > > > I have a set of questions for the group, based on this "evolution > without > > > life?" thread. Howard wrote: > > > > > > > HP: Who is dismissing what? I'm all in favor of new ways of thinking > and > > > modeling. All we ask for a scientific model is that there must be some > > > consensus on how to tell what is real and what is imaginary. > > > > > > My questions: > > > > > > How do you define REAL? > > > > > > What is acceptable proof of reality? > > > > > > Is the definition of IMAGINARY in this usage "UNPROVEN"? > > > > > > If acceptable proof can't be determined about some proposed "entity", > does > > > that make it IMAGINARY? > > > > > > > > > Judith > > > >
Attachment:
A brief note on Ken Wilber.doc
Description: MS-Word document