Re: Relational space

[James N Rose <***>]

John,

Have my kids this weekend and not much time to write.
Will compose to you and Howard again later this weekend.

But reading your last pgh gave me pause - and urge
to mention an idea .  You wrote:

>
> UFT or TOE? I wouldn't even mention such 'know-it-all' levels at this - not
> even embryonic state of our epistemic 'enrichment' in our cognitive
> inventory.
> We can include only the models we use. We formed the models without a
> knowledge of the total. We observed that came to our sight - as we saw it.
> Our technological-practical success gives us a feeling of omniscients.
> Cheers
>


It seems to me normal -and- reasonable to ponder on aspects "beyond"
our experience.  I've never 'experienced' a trillion dollars, yet I
wouldn't hesitate to speak -with confidence- about that amount of
money.  Science hasn't/couldn't bean-count -every- human on the
planet, yet -can- extrapolate population trends.  So, to extrapolate
- or better yet: more clearly identify experienced qualities and
relations .. as pervasive and holistically present/valid/real - is
not an unreasonable act to engage in, to feel some degree of confidence
in, and to trust [pending some subsequent bit of knowledge and conceiving
that might force another paradigm jump  :-)  ].

till later...
Jamie