Re: Relational "Space"

[Judith Rosen <***>]

Tim,

What if the phenomenon you speak of is being caused by the conformation? As
opposed to what you had below:

> Tim wrote: But if phenomenon = conformation, then primary structure alone,
apart from
> conformation, is not a phenomenon and hence not perceivable. That is what
I
> mean by "by definition". In this case it would not be a technological
issue.>

If "phenomenon" is generaged by "conformation" as opposed to being equal to
it as you had in your assumption, then it's a whole different world, isn't
it?

Judith