Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement?

[Kevin de Laplante <***>]

Dan,

>
> A relational "space" in which dynamics of correlations and
> communication are born, grow, evolve and die at least partly
> independent of dynamics in a metric space of physical and
> material dynamics could be a general approach to explaining
> non-locality and seeming instantaneous/simultaneous events.
> In a relational space there might be no "distance" between two
> "particles" - they might occupy the same "coordinates" and be
> subject to the same relational "environmental context" and
> thus the same "relational forcing functions". The distance in
> relational space could be qualitatively different from distance
> in physical space.
>

I think that David Bohm's interpretation of quantum mechanics comes closest
to the description you're giving here.  And I'm thinking here more of his
2nd order meta-interpretation -- i.e. his writings on "wholeness and the
implicate order" -- rather than his 1st order interpretation -- i.e. his
causal, deterministic, nonlocal interpretation of the formalism of quantum
mechanics.

I find the general set of ideas you're alluding to here very provocative,
though.  It would be totally cool to work out something like this in detail.
Unfortunately, I  haven't a clue how to do it!

Kevin