[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index

Re: Function, unfractionable as first principle



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ROSEN Forum [mailto:***]On Behalf Of Dan
> Fiscus
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 5:34 PM
> To: ***
> Subject: Re: Function, unfractionable as first principle
>
>
> Tim Gwinn wrote:
>
> > Thanks, that helps me understand it better.
> > This sounds somewhat along the lines of Don's alternate
> (M,R)-system that
> > explicitly includes anabolic/catabolic pathways, which are
> integral to the
> > diagram as a whole. Have you looked at that on his website?
>
> Is this the same article as the one showing Gaia as an organism as
> in closed to efficient cause? I saw this once but now cannot find it
> on his site. Can you send the URL?

Dan,

The above was an old thread, but I was reading some old Bulletin of Mathematical Biology journals I had bought awhile back and ran across something you might find interesting with regard to your CCP (coupled complementary processes).
 
In an article entitled "Towards an Optimal Design Principle in Relational Biology" by H.M. Martinez (BMB:26-4, 1964), regarding the (M,R) system he writes in his introduction:
"In the approach by R. Rosen for the relational representation of the metabolic aspects of unicellular organisms it is assumed that this physiological process is decomposable into a collection of two types of component processes. One type, collectively called the M components, stands roughly for the set of catabolic processes, while the other, consisting of the R components, can be interpreted as the anabolic part."
I had never considered the M & R processes in that light, nor do I recall recall Rosen mentioning it (so I don't know what his view would be). But I recall you asking once about the (M,R) model and complementary processes, and so I thought I'd just mention it to you. This is a somewhat different view than Don M.'s extended (M,R) model (http://www.people.vcu.edu/~mikuleck/cellmr.html) which includes additional explicit pathways to/from B to represent anabolic/catabolic pathways.
 
Regards,
Tim