|
Tim and Pete,
I have not seen such a meaningful post for a
long time.
(It was also exciting to 'personalize' the
colorfulness since both of you used several colors, for a partially
colorblind) but the contents are clear and seem right. Well expressed
also.
I wanted to barge in when I got to the part
where Tim wrote the same position very adequately. Also Pete's arguments echoed
in
my mind reasonably with one questionable point
(which extended later into Tim's parts as well): the assumption that "y" is
time.
I called space and time "crutches" of the
reductionistic himan mind to 'organize' the details we can observe.
I still struggle with 'words' how to formulate
'changes' and 'processes' without a timely sequence (eliminating cause totally
from a deterinistic system) - maye not the words proper - the images as well.
Our human mind has to be raped to 'think' in the 'No Timely Sequence'
process/change, some variable potential of interaction going 'anyway' as
incoming qualities require.
I apologize for being in a maze nowadays
preventing me from the lear composing of ideas. I may come back later, maybe I
need less spam in my mailbox or more relaxed sleep.
Anyway, I would like to read Pete's "longer"
text as well.
With best personal regards
John Mikes
|