[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
 
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Consistency vs. Correspondence
- From: "McIntyre, Mike S." <***>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:31:58 -0500
John Kineman wrote:
>This was VERY dissatisfying to the physicists who were forced to accept
>it after Einstein, and particularly dissatisfying to Einstein who spent
>the remainder of his life trying to disprove it (the famous "God doesn't
>play dice" quote).
Hi John,
I just wanted to interject a brief comment here. This level of dis-
satisfaction on the part of ~European~ physicists seems not to have been
shared by ~American~ physicists, i.e. there seems to have been a cul-
tural subtext to this question that affected the reactions of the
physicists. European physicists, in general, had minds well-stocked
with philosophical ideas dating back, in a relatively unbroken line, to
the ancient Greeks. In contrast, American physicists had much less
training, or interest, in philosophy -- they thought of themselves as
pragmatists. The result was that Americans accepted quantum theory
without so much as skipping a beat, and they frankly couldn't understand
why the Europeans were so bugged about it. Or, at any rate, this is the
argument advanced by Nancy Cartwright in a chapter she wrote for a book
called The Probabilistic Revolution. Cartwright, as I understand her,
favors the American point of view. Even though I think my tendencies
lie more with the Europeans, I think her exposition of the differences
between the two points of view is very good.
Best regards,
Mike McIntyre