ROSEN Mailing List Archives (by date)

• Re: Inequivalence of models - Howard Pattee (Tue Jan 18 04:19:40 GMT 2005)
• Re: Inequivalence of models - Judith Rosen (Tue Jan 18 03:11:29 GMT 2005)
• Re: Inequivalence of models - John M (Mon Jan 17 23:12:51 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - Jerry Zhu (Mon Jan 17 22:26:22 GMT 2005)
• Re: Inequivalence of models - Judith Rosen (Mon Jan 17 21:15:22 GMT 2005)
• Re: Inequivalence of models - Tim Gwinn (Mon Jan 17 17:39:40 GMT 2005)
• Re: Inequivalence of models - John M (Mon Jan 17 15:36:51 GMT 2005)
• Re: Inequivalence of models - Howard Pattee (Sun Jan 16 21:29:48 GMT 2005)
• Re: Inequivalence of models - Tim Gwinn (Sun Jan 16 18:10:21 GMT 2005)
• Re: Inequivalence of models - John M (Sun Jan 16 17:04:09 GMT 2005)
• Re: Inequivalence of models - John M (Sun Jan 16 16:53:10 GMT 2005)
• Re: Inequivalence of models - Tim Gwinn (Sun Jan 16 16:18:40 GMT 2005)
• Inequivalence of models - Steve Johnson (Sun Jan 16 05:27:25 GMT 2005)
• Re: Fundamentals of measurement and representation.... - Howard Pattee (Sat Jan 15 02:25:07 GMT 2005)
• Re: Fundamentals of measurement and representation.... - Judith Rosen (Sat Jan 15 01:28:11 GMT 2005)
• Re: Fundamentals of measurement and representation.... - Howard Pattee (Fri Jan 14 23:04:08 GMT 2005)
• Fundamentals of measurement and representation.... - Judith Rosen (Fri Jan 14 11:31:29 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - Howard Pattee (Fri Jan 14 01:48:30 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - Tim Gwinn (Thu Jan 13 18:59:11 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - Boris Saulnier (Thu Jan 13 17:14:16 GMT 2005)
• Re: cell life cycle - Jerry Zhu (Thu Jan 13 16:47:43 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - Tim Gwinn (Thu Jan 13 13:15:13 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - Judith Rosen (Thu Jan 13 04:18:15 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - Judith Rosen (Thu Jan 13 03:54:32 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - Jerry Zhu (Thu Jan 13 02:46:24 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - Tim Gwinn (Thu Jan 13 02:42:15 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - Howard Pattee (Thu Jan 13 00:17:44 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - Judith Rosen (Wed Jan 12 23:04:12 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - Howard Pattee (Wed Jan 12 17:40:54 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - John M (Wed Jan 12 14:46:36 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - Tim Gwinn (Wed Jan 12 14:30:34 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - Tim Gwinn (Wed Jan 12 13:58:33 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - Arno Goudsmit (Wed Jan 12 10:50:13 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why four categories of causation? - Jannie Hofmeyr (Wed Jan 12 07:24:38 GMT 2005)
• Why four categories of causation? - Steve Johnson (Wed Jan 12 03:56:21 GMT 2005)
• Scenescence - Steve Johnson (Wed Jan 12 01:33:24 GMT 2005)
• Re: cell life cycle - Steve Johnson (Wed Jan 12 01:22:50 GMT 2005)
• cell life cycle - Jerry Zhu (Wed Jan 12 00:47:09 GMT 2005)
• Re: topic reminder - Howard Pattee (Wed Jan 12 00:16:30 GMT 2005)
• Re: topic reminder - John M (Tue Jan 11 20:41:48 GMT 2005)
• Re: sixth sense (and seventh, eighth, ninth...) - Jerry Zhu (Tue Jan 11 12:53:59 GMT 2005)
• Re: Topic Reminder, collaborative consciousness - Ayten Aydin (Tue Jan 11 08:31:21 GMT 2005)
• Re: topic reminder - Ayten Aydin (Tue Jan 11 08:10:30 GMT 2005)
• Re: topic reminder - Howard Pattee (Mon Jan 10 22:13:09 GMT 2005)
• Re: Topic Reminder, collaborative consciousness - Dan Fiscus (Mon Jan 10 16:59:23 GMT 2005)
• Re: sixth sense (and seventh, eighth, ninth...) - Steve Johnson (Mon Jan 10 15:14:12 GMT 2005)
• Re: sixth sense (and seventh, eighth, ninth...) - Jerry Zhu (Mon Jan 10 04:34:54 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why ignore the 'unknown or non-obvious? - James N Rose (Mon Jan 10 01:47:38 GMT 2005)
• Re: Topic Reminder - Ayten Aydin (Sun Jan 09 09:30:25 GMT 2005)
• Re: sixth sense (and seventh, eighth, ninth...) - Ayten Aydin (Sun Jan 09 08:33:15 GMT 2005)
• Re: sixth sense (and seventh, eighth, ninth...) - Judith Rosen (Sun Jan 09 03:34:48 GMT 2005)
• Re: sixth sense (and seventh, eighth, ninth...) - Jerry Zhu (Sat Jan 08 21:11:46 GMT 2005)
• Re: Topic Reminder - Tim Gwinn (Sat Jan 08 18:45:36 GMT 2005)
• Re: Topic Reminder - Tim Gwinn (Sat Jan 08 18:40:26 GMT 2005)
• Re: Topic Reminder - Judith Rosen (Sat Jan 08 15:27:53 GMT 2005)
• Re: Topic Reminder - Steve Johnson (Sat Jan 08 14:43:28 GMT 2005)
• Topic Reminder - Tim Gwinn (Sat Jan 08 13:50:23 GMT 2005)
• Re: sixth sense (and seventh, eighth, ninth...) - Judith Rosen (Sat Jan 08 13:12:33 GMT 2005)
• Re: sixth sense (and seventh, eighth, ninth...) - John M (Sat Jan 08 04:59:03 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why ignore the 'unknown or non-obvious? - Steve Johnson (Sat Jan 08 04:06:57 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why ignore the 'unknown or non-obvious? - James N Rose (Sat Jan 08 01:32:16 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why ignore the 'unknown or non-obvious? - Ayten Aydin (Fri Jan 07 19:03:05 GMT 2005)
• Re: Why ignore the 'unknown or non-obvious? - Judith Rosen (Fri Jan 07 16:41:06 GMT 2005)
• Why ignore the 'unknown or non-obvious? - James N Rose (Fri Jan 07 15:39:19 GMT 2005)
• Re: sixth sense (and seventh, eighth, ninth...) - Judith Rosen (Fri Jan 07 12:30:56 GMT 2005)
• Re: Karl Popper/False positives...life story - Jerry Zhu (Fri Jan 07 03:29:33 GMT 2005)
• sixth sense - Steve Johnson (Fri Jan 07 02:11:01 GMT 2005)
• Re: Thinking about the Rosennean challenge - Jack Park (Thu Jan 06 17:22:37 GMT 2005)
• Re: Karl Popper/False positives... - John M (Thu Jan 06 16:29:27 GMT 2005)
• Re: Thinking about the Rosennean challenge - Dan Fiscus (Thu Jan 06 16:22:32 GMT 2005)
• Thinking about the Rosennean challenge - Jack Park (Thu Jan 06 15:37:13 GMT 2005)
• Re: forcing - Tim Gwinn (Thu Jan 06 14:56:15 GMT 2005)
• Re: Anyone up to a Rosennean challenge? - Judith Rosen (Thu Jan 06 13:03:44 GMT 2005)
• forcing - Steve Johnson (Thu Jan 06 03:35:15 GMT 2005)
• Re: Anyone up to a Rosennean challenge? - John M (Wed Jan 05 22:37:23 GMT 2005)
• Other views...Re: Karl Popper/False positives... - Jack Park (Wed Jan 05 19:27:02 GMT 2005)
• Re: Anyone up to a Rosennean challenge? - Judith Rosen (Wed Jan 05 19:24:01 GMT 2005)
• Re: Karl Popper/False positives...life story - Dan Fiscus (Wed Jan 05 17:22:49 GMT 2005)
• Re: Karl Popper/False positives... - Tim Gwinn (Wed Jan 05 16:52:47 GMT 2005)
• Re: Karl Popper/False positives... - Jerry Zhu (Wed Jan 05 16:05:09 GMT 2005)
• Re: Anyone up to a Rosennean challenge? - Ayten Aydin (Wed Jan 05 10:36:02 GMT 2005)
• Re: Anyone up to a Rosennean challenge? - James N Rose (Wed Jan 05 05:08:42 GMT 2005)
• Re: Anyone up to a Rosennean challenge? - Judith Rosen (Wed Jan 05 02:38:18 GMT 2005)
• Re: E.T. Jaynes - Tim Gwinn (Wed Jan 05 01:44:23 GMT 2005)
• E.T. Jaynes - Steve Johnson (Wed Jan 05 00:00:57 GMT 2005)
• Re: Karl Popper/False positives... - John Kineman (Tue Jan 04 23:45:54 GMT 2005)
• Re: Anyone up to a Rosennean challenge? - John M (Tue Jan 04 21:48:48 GMT 2005)
• Re: "The Phenogenetic Logic of Life" - Jack Park (Tue Jan 04 19:26:24 GMT 2005)
• "The Phenogenetic Logic of Life" - Tim Gwinn (Tue Jan 04 18:31:42 GMT 2005)
• Re: Karl Popper/False positives... - Judith Rosen (Tue Jan 04 18:17:38 GMT 2005)
• Re: Karl Popper/False positives... - Jack Park (Tue Jan 04 17:58:05 GMT 2005)
• Re: Rosennean challenge? Brun's - Tim Gwinn (Tue Jan 04 17:54:52 GMT 2005)
• Re: Karl Popper/False positives... - Tim Gwinn (Tue Jan 04 17:38:40 GMT 2005)
• Re: Rosennean challenge? Brun's - Judith Rosen (Tue Jan 04 17:34:25 GMT 2005)
• Re: Karl Popper/False positives... - Jack Park (Tue Jan 04 17:32:11 GMT 2005)
• Re: Karl Popper/False positives... - Judith Rosen (Tue Jan 04 17:05:42 GMT 2005)
• Re: Rosennean challenge? Brun's - Tim Gwinn (Tue Jan 04 16:54:34 GMT 2005)
• Re: Anyone up to a Rosennean challenge? - Jack Park (Tue Jan 04 16:14:18 GMT 2005)
• Re: Anyone up to a Rosennean challenge? - Judith Rosen (Tue Jan 04 15:46:32 GMT 2005)
• Re: Rosennean challenge? Brun's - Dan Fiscus (Tue Jan 04 15:05:39 GMT 2005)
• "congruence via encoding" - Howard Pattee (Tue Jan 04 01:50:21 GMT 2005)
• Re: What is special about humans? - John M (Mon Jan 03 22:18:31 GMT 2005)
• Re: Anyone up to a Rosennean challenge? - John M (Mon Jan 03 22:18:22 GMT 2005)
• Re: Anyone up to a Rosennean challenge? - Tim Gwinn (Mon Jan 03 22:01:15 GMT 2005)
• Anyone up to a Rosennean challenge? - Judith Rosen (Mon Jan 03 14:19:37 GMT 2005)
• Re: What is special about humans? - Judith Rosen (Mon Jan 03 03:59:16 GMT 2005)
• Re: What is special about humans? - Jerry Zhu (Mon Jan 03 02:42:37 GMT 2005)
• Re: What is special about humans? - John M (Sun Jan 02 21:23:00 GMT 2005)
• Re: simulation as a causal/inferential "chimera" - Tim Gwinn (Sun Jan 02 21:12:18 GMT 2005)
• Work in progress 2 - Ayten Aydin (Sun Jan 02 18:44:02 GMT 2005)
• Re: What is special about humans? - Jerry Zhu (Sun Jan 02 18:25:07 GMT 2005)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Jack Park (Sun Jan 02 16:56:52 GMT 2005)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - John M (Sun Jan 02 16:12:00 GMT 2005)
• Re: simulation as a causal/inferential "chimera" - Tim Gwinn (Sun Jan 02 03:18:24 GMT 2005)
• Re: simulation as a causal/inferential "chimera" - Steve Johnson (Sat Jan 01 21:45:30 GMT 2005)
• Re: simulation as a causal/inferential "chimera" - Steve Johnson (Sat Jan 01 21:45:28 GMT 2005)
• Re: simulation as a causal/inferential "chimera" - Tim Gwinn (Sat Jan 01 21:32:26 GMT 2005)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Jack Park (Sat Jan 01 18:20:36 GMT 2005)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - John M (Sat Jan 01 18:06:11 GMT 2005)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - John M (Sat Jan 01 17:56:25 GMT 2005)
• Re: What is special about humans? - Judith Rosen (Sat Jan 01 17:25:38 GMT 2005)
• Re: What is special about humans? - Jerry Zhu (Sat Jan 01 04:44:03 GMT 2005)
• Re: simulation as a causal/inferential "chimera" - Howard Pattee (Sat Jan 01 00:12:43 GMT 2005)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - John M (Fri Dec 31 23:22:30 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation as a causal/inferential "chimera" - Judith Rosen (Fri Dec 31 23:04:00 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Tim Gwinn (Fri Dec 31 21:04:19 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation as a causal/inferential "chimera" - Tim Gwinn (Fri Dec 31 21:02:01 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Jerry Zhu (Fri Dec 31 20:41:20 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Tim Gwinn (Fri Dec 31 19:56:28 GMT 2004)
• Re: What is special about humans? - Steve Johnson (Fri Dec 31 19:48:10 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation as a causal/inferential "chimera" - Steve Johnson (Fri Dec 31 19:36:25 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Jack Park (Fri Dec 31 19:24:39 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation as a causal/inferential "chimera" - Tim Gwinn (Fri Dec 31 19:13:41 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Jack Park (Fri Dec 31 19:11:06 GMT 2004)
• Re: What is special about humans? - Jerry Zhu (Fri Dec 31 18:57:18 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Judith Rosen (Fri Dec 31 18:53:35 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation as a causal/inferential "chimera" - Steve Johnson (Fri Dec 31 18:52:15 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Judith Rosen (Fri Dec 31 18:48:03 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation as a causal/inferential "chimera" - Tim Gwinn (Fri Dec 31 18:43:27 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Judith Rosen (Fri Dec 31 18:38:43 GMT 2004)
• Re: Randomness... - Steve Johnson (Fri Dec 31 18:38:09 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Tim Gwinn (Fri Dec 31 18:35:02 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Jack Park (Fri Dec 31 18:28:25 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Tim Gwinn (Fri Dec 31 18:17:24 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Judith Rosen (Fri Dec 31 18:01:34 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Judith Rosen (Fri Dec 31 17:38:09 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation as a causal/inferential "chimera" - Steve Johnson (Fri Dec 31 17:37:49 GMT 2004)
• simulation as a causal/inferential "chimera" - Steve Johnson (Fri Dec 31 17:33:12 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Howard Pattee (Fri Dec 31 16:43:12 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - John M (Fri Dec 31 16:20:26 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Judith Rosen (Fri Dec 31 16:02:39 GMT 2004)
• Re: What is Natural Law? Dualism in modelling relation. - Howard Pattee (Fri Dec 31 15:25:47 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Tim Gwinn (Fri Dec 31 14:58:21 GMT 2004)
• Re: What is special about humans? - Tim Gwinn (Fri Dec 31 14:34:22 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Tim Gwinn (Fri Dec 31 14:27:23 GMT 2004)
• Re: What is Natural Law? Dualism in modelling relation. - Judith Rosen (Fri Dec 31 13:15:22 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. mimesis - Judith Rosen (Fri Dec 31 13:04:05 GMT 2004)
• What is special about humans? - Steve Johnson (Fri Dec 31 07:22:43 GMT 2004)
• simulation vs. mimesis - Steve Johnson (Fri Dec 31 06:21:18 GMT 2004)
• Re: What is Natural Law? - Steve Johnson (Fri Dec 31 06:01:22 GMT 2004)
• Re: What is Natural Law? Dualism in modelling relation. - Steve Johnson (Fri Dec 31 06:01:17 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. model - Tim Gwinn (Fri Dec 31 05:26:05 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. model - Tim Gwinn (Fri Dec 31 05:07:53 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. model - Judith Rosen (Fri Dec 31 04:43:53 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. model - Tim Gwinn (Fri Dec 31 04:25:42 GMT 2004)
• Randomness... - Judith Rosen (Fri Dec 31 04:22:29 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. model - Judith Rosen (Fri Dec 31 03:50:25 GMT 2004)
• Re: simulation vs. model - Howard Pattee (Fri Dec 31 03:16:45 GMT 2004)
• Re: BioTheory launch delayed... - Judith Rosen (Thu Dec 30 15:57:45 GMT 2004)
• Re: BioTheory launch delayed... - Tim Gwinn (Thu Dec 30 15:26:47 GMT 2004)
• BioTheory launch delayed... - Judith Rosen (Thu Dec 30 15:13:50 GMT 2004)
• Re: Turing machines and tape length - Howard Pattee (Wed Dec 29 15:54:33 GMT 2004)
• Re: Turing machines and tape length - Tim Gwinn (Wed Dec 29 14:10:09 GMT 2004)
• Re: Turing machines and tape length - Howard Pattee (Wed Dec 29 02:24:39 GMT 2004)
• Re: Turing machines and tape length - Tim Gwinn (Tue Dec 28 18:45:33 GMT 2004)
• Re: Turing machines and tape length - Howard Pattee (Tue Dec 28 16:14:50 GMT 2004)
• Re: Simulations - Tim Gwinn (Tue Dec 28 15:53:14 GMT 2004)
• Re: Modeling vs. Simulation [from "fundamental problems in physics"] - Tim Gwinn (Tue Dec 28 14:46:07 GMT 2004)
• Re: Turing machines and tape length - Tim Gwinn (Tue Dec 28 13:34:50 GMT 2004)
• Re: Turing machines and tape length - Howard Pattee (Tue Dec 28 12:59:42 GMT 2004)
• Re: The definition of Formality - Howard Pattee (Tue Dec 28 12:46:59 GMT 2004)
• Re: What Physicists REALLY Think - Pete Giansante (Tue Dec 28 00:51:40 GMT 2004)
• Re: Models and ecosystem balance/change... - John Kineman (Mon Dec 27 23:55:46 GMT 2004)
• Re: Modeling vs. Simulation [from "fundamental problems in physics"] - John Kineman (Mon Dec 27 23:47:34 GMT 2004)
• Re: Modeling vs. Simulation [from "fundamental problems in physics"] - John Kineman (Mon Dec 27 23:31:55 GMT 2004)
• Re: Modeling vs. Simulation [from "fundamental problems in physics"] - John Kineman (Mon Dec 27 23:28:55 GMT 2004)
• Re: What Physicists REALLY Think - John Kineman (Mon Dec 27 22:53:38 GMT 2004)
• Re: What is Natural Law? - John Kineman (Mon Dec 27 22:49:46 GMT 2004)
• Re: The definition of Formality - Judith Rosen (Mon Dec 27 22:19:41 GMT 2004)
• Re: Turing machines and tape length - Tim Gwinn (Mon Dec 27 21:14:24 GMT 2004)
• Re: Turing machines and tape lenth - Howard Pattee (Mon Dec 27 20:49:29 GMT 2004)
• Re: Turing machines and tape length - Judith Rosen (Mon Dec 27 15:12:21 GMT 2004)
• Re: Turing machines and tape length - Howard Pattee (Mon Dec 27 02:06:19 GMT 2004)
• Re: What Physicists REALLY Think - John M (Thu Dec 23 22:29:22 GMT 2004)
• Re: Turing machines and tape length - Tim Gwinn (Thu Dec 23 15:39:21 GMT 2004)
• Re: Modeling vs. Simulation [from "fundamental problems in physics"] - John M (Wed Dec 22 23:51:05 GMT 2004)
• Re: Models and ecosystem balance/change... - John M (Wed Dec 22 23:50:37 GMT 2004)
• Re: Which part of the brain is conscious? - John M (Wed Dec 22 23:50:10 GMT 2004)
• Re: Biological Models Computability - Howard Pattee (Wed Dec 22 16:09:29 GMT 2004)
• Fwd: Re: meanings of model - Howard Pattee (Wed Dec 22 15:59:34 GMT 2004)