ROSEN Mailing List Archives (by Author)

• John Kineman
  • Re: What is Natural Law?(Mon Dec 27 22:49:46 GMT 2004)
  • Re: What Physicists REALLY Think(Mon Dec 27 22:53:38 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Modeling vs. Simulation [from "fundamental problems in physics"](Mon Dec 27 23:28:55 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Modeling vs. Simulation [from "fundamental problems in physics"](Mon Dec 27 23:31:55 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Modeling vs. Simulation [from "fundamental problems in physics"](Mon Dec 27 23:47:34 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Models and ecosystem balance/change...(Mon Dec 27 23:55:46 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Karl Popper/False positives...(Tue Jan 04 23:45:54 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Quiet list...(Fri Apr 15 15:12:25 GMT 2005)
• John M
  • Re: Are car engines complex?(Sat Jun 21 21:09:04 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Levels of Rosennean Complexity(Mon Jun 23 15:07:05 GMT 2003)
  • [no subject](Tue Jun 24 19:31:18 GMT 2003)
  • [no subject](Tue Jun 24 20:02:53 GMT 2003)
  • [no subject](Sat Jun 28 18:26:32 GMT 2003)
  • [no subject](Mon Jun 30 21:49:17 GMT 2003)
  • Re: ontological levels(Mon Jun 30 22:07:46 GMT 2003)
  • Re: List Review options - privacy question(Wed Jul 09 19:31:48 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Function, Symbiosis, Parasitism(Wed Jul 09 20:11:43 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Function, Symbiosis, Parasitism(Thu Jul 10 13:30:45 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Function, Symbiosis, Parasitism(Thu Jul 10 19:44:13 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Function, Symbiosis, Parasitism(Sat Jul 12 03:04:16 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Function, Symbiosis, Parasitism(Sat Jul 12 14:34:16 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Any suggestions? - newsgroups(Sat Jul 26 19:33:02 GMT 2003)
  • Re: A name I've never heard mention of...(Sun Jul 27 16:18:22 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Any suggestions? - newsgroups(Sun Jul 27 16:48:44 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Any suggestions? -(Mon Jul 28 18:23:31 GMT 2003)
  • complex(Tue Jul 29 02:04:56 GMT 2003)
  • Re: complex(Wed Jul 30 13:58:33 GMT 2003)
  • Re: complex(Wed Jul 30 22:12:59 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Autopoiesis, Rosen Complexity, boundedness(Thu Jul 31 14:48:09 GMT 2003)
  • Re: A rough draft of a paper by Robert Rosen(Wed Aug 06 14:18:51 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Excerpts from Robert Rosen's last book notes:(Fri Aug 08 21:19:30 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Greetings(Thu Aug 14 20:46:49 GMT 2003)
  • Re: MR as ontological(?)(Sun Aug 17 21:54:50 GMT 2003)
  • Re: MR as ontological(Wed Aug 20 15:35:24 GMT 2003)
  • Re: complexity ontological or epistemological(Wed Aug 20 15:35:32 GMT 2003)
  • Re: List software request(Fri Aug 22 15:35:23 GMT 2003)
  • Panpsych - was: MR as ontological, Fechner(Mon Aug 25 15:59:39 GMT 2003)
  • Panpsych - was: MR as ontological, Fechner(Mon Aug 25 16:12:00 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Argument for world-soul, in Fechner's own words(Fri Aug 29 15:05:39 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Argument for world-soul, in Fechner's own words(Sat Aug 30 02:34:31 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Function and functional organization(Sat Aug 30 03:04:54 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Function and functional organization(Sat Aug 30 19:06:54 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Function and functional organization(Sun Aug 31 16:38:26 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Rosennean ideas used as a "weapon"?....exobiology(Mon Sep 01 20:26:54 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Function and functional organization(Mon Sep 01 21:57:55 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Rosennean ideas used as a "weapon"?....exobiology(Wed Sep 03 01:44:23 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Function and functional organization(Thu Sep 04 14:59:39 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Function and functional organization(Thu Sep 04 21:02:44 GMT 2003)
  • Re: [life] Machines and wholeness - a speculative hierarcy(Sat Sep 13 14:29:53 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Daisyworld / N-body(Thu Sep 25 00:21:09 GMT 2003)
  • Re: anticipatory - Daisyworld(Fri Sep 26 14:14:13 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Fw: Rosennean definition of "life"(Fri Sep 26 14:14:24 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Rosean definition of life(Sat Sep 27 15:26:36 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Rosean definition of life(Sat Sep 27 15:57:35 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Anticipation/Anticipatory(Sun Sep 28 15:03:10 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Anticipation/Anticipatory(Mon Sep 29 19:18:26 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Viruses and Chimera(Tue Sep 30 22:08:58 GMT 2003)
  • Re: When does an (M,R) system cease to be alive?(Tue Oct 07 16:41:42 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Time/Life/Science(Tue Oct 07 22:33:42 GMT 2003)
  • Re: When does an (M,R) system cease to be alive?(Wed Oct 08 14:44:33 GMT 2003)
  • Re: When does an (M,R) system cease to be alive?(Wed Oct 08 23:03:23 GMT 2003)
  • Re: kampis(Wed Oct 22 19:53:15 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Time and context(Wed Oct 22 21:26:48 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Time and change(Thu Oct 23 14:50:48 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Time and change(Sun Oct 26 22:38:35 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Promoting Rosennean concepts(Mon Nov 03 14:56:55 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Single atom universes, etc.(Thu Nov 06 15:48:19 GMT 2003)
  • Re: E Pluribus Unum(Thu Nov 06 22:10:54 GMT 2003)
  • Re: FW: Tholar Energy Mythth/ Please thtand by....(Sat Nov 08 22:26:33 GMT 2003)
  • Re: [COMPLEX-M] 2nd Law and Ecosystems(Fri Nov 14 23:49:23 GMT 2003)
  • cross[pst(Sat Nov 15 16:44:13 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Cross-posting, practice and theory(Sat Nov 15 21:44:48 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Cross-posting, practice and theory(Sun Nov 16 16:31:52 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Proprietary Constraints: Re: copyrights? [per TG & JJK + JM](Mon Nov 17 21:20:46 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Rosen & Ashby(Wed Nov 19 03:27:56 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Rosen & Ashby(Sun Nov 23 16:57:34 GMT 2003)
  • Re: HAPPY THANKSGIVING, EVERYONE!(Thu Nov 27 23:03:30 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Mycoplasma information?(Sat Nov 29 15:05:35 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Death and experience(Sat Nov 29 22:18:37 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Death and experience(Sun Nov 30 16:15:40 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Consciousness and death(Sun Nov 30 16:15:47 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Senescence(Mon Dec 01 15:43:07 GMT 2003)
  • Fw: Consciousness and death(Mon Dec 01 20:20:41 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Footers to posts?(Mon Dec 15 22:24:36 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Prion research and mad cow disease(Sat Dec 27 15:46:07 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Prion research and mad cow disease(Sun Dec 28 00:23:57 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Prion research and mad cow disease(Mon Dec 29 02:40:28 GMT 2003)
  • prion(Mon Dec 29 23:23:57 GMT 2003)
  • your question(Tue Dec 30 16:53:19 GMT 2003)
  • Re: The stupidity of Agribusiness decisions(Tue Dec 30 20:02:42 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Web-searchable list archives(Wed Dec 31 23:07:49 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Rashevsky's influence on Robert Rosen(Sat Jan 24 20:18:16 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Rashevsky's influence on Robert Rosen(Sun Jan 25 22:58:51 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Selling Rosen to the University(Sun Jan 25 22:58:52 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Describing Rosennean Complexity(Tue Jan 27 22:44:54 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Describing Rosennean Complexity(Wed Jan 28 03:42:18 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Describing...(Wed Jan 28 13:38:15 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Describing...(Wed Jan 28 16:57:48 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Describing Rosennean Complexity(Wed Jan 28 19:51:44 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Describing...(Wed Jan 28 19:51:47 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Rosenean theory catch-22's(Thu Jan 29 15:38:07 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Rosennean Complexity - Theory of Everything(Sat Jan 31 16:15:33 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Rosenean theory, Nature article(Sat Jan 31 16:29:04 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Theory of Everything, determinism(Mon Feb 02 20:45:48 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Reductionism and information(Tue Feb 03 16:33:44 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Information and Volition(Tue Feb 03 21:36:04 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Information and Volition(Wed Feb 04 16:26:12 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Information and Volition(Thu Feb 05 14:55:37 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Information and Volition(Thu Feb 05 23:41:01 GMT 2004)
  • Re: The nature of sleep...- camera(Wed Feb 11 17:06:55 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Robert Rosen on the implications of Anticipatory Systems (excerpt)(Thu Feb 12 23:25:33 GMT 2004)
  • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement?(Mon Feb 16 21:24:21 GMT 2004)
  • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement?(Tue Feb 17 16:06:01 GMT 2004)
  • Re: explanation for teleportation/entanglement?(Tue Feb 17 22:21:18 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Paper by Landauer and Bellman(Wed Feb 25 22:15:35 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Paper by Landauer and Bellman(Thu Feb 26 16:54:03 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Medical science and Rosennean Complexity(Thu Mar 11 23:28:10 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Horizontal scrolling(Fri Mar 12 15:23:38 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Plain txt - was: Rosennean ideas and better modelling...(Sat Mar 13 16:04:00 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Relational "Space"(Thu Mar 18 04:24:13 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Relational "Space"(Thu Mar 18 15:00:29 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Relational "Space" - Ulanowicz works(Thu Mar 18 21:26:27 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Relational "Space"(Thu Mar 18 22:51:49 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Relational "Space" - Ulanowicz works(Fri Mar 19 19:40:10 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Relational "Space"(Fri Mar 19 20:05:39 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Relational space(Sat Mar 20 22:26:01 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life(Sun Mar 21 16:46:02 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life(Mon Mar 22 21:35:18 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life(Mon Mar 22 22:28:14 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life?(Mon Mar 22 23:10:46 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Comparing Rosennean Complexity(Wed Mar 24 21:42:20 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Comparing Rosennean Complexity(Wed Mar 24 22:47:30 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Howard's challenge(Thu Mar 25 20:12:15 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Nature magazine article(Sat Mar 27 15:33:57 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Nature magazine article- oops! Here it is.(Sat Mar 27 19:47:18 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Vipassana et al.(Sat Mar 27 20:17:23 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Nature magazine article. review(Sat Mar 27 21:48:05 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Science and Religion(Sun Mar 28 16:36:42 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems(Sun Mar 28 16:51:20 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Science and Religion(Mon Mar 29 16:17:09 GMT 2004)
  • Re: anticipation(Mon Mar 29 16:47:28 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Science and Religion(Mon Mar 29 16:47:41 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems(Mon Mar 29 17:02:16 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Science and Religion(Tue Mar 30 15:54:57 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems(Tue Mar 30 16:25:17 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Nature magazine article- On niches and neutralities(Wed Mar 31 03:23:33 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Raising Issues(Thu Apr 01 15:15:37 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Judith's challenge #1 - repost of JJK comment, with indexing(Thu Apr 01 15:57:09 GMT 2004)
  • Re: the use of the word predictive(Thu Apr 01 22:16:05 GMT 2004)
  • Re: abstractions & ontologies(Thu Apr 01 22:28:35 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Teleology(Fri Apr 02 15:10:37 GMT 2004)
  • Re: the use of the word predictive(Fri Apr 02 22:42:40 GMT 2004)
  • Re: the use of the word predictive(Sat Apr 03 15:14:52 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Teleology and vitalism(Sun Apr 04 17:02:15 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Teleology and vitalism(Mon Apr 05 14:26:35 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Question(Tue Apr 06 21:45:50 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Question, version 2, building models(Thu Apr 08 19:28:57 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Question, version 2(Sat Apr 10 21:59:55 GMT 2004)
  • Re: life as other than cellular/organismic(Tue Apr 13 20:59:23 GMT 2004)
  • Re: life as other than cellular/organismic(Tue Apr 13 22:46:27 GMT 2004)
  • Re: life as other than cellular/organismic(Wed Apr 14 15:52:48 GMT 2004)
  • Re: life as other than cellular/organismic(Wed Apr 14 22:54:26 GMT 2004)
  • Re: life as other than cellular/organismic(Thu Apr 15 02:45:26 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Definition of Proof(Thu Apr 15 14:20:02 GMT 2004)
  • apology(Thu Apr 15 14:20:07 GMT 2004)
  • Re: life as other than cellular/organismic(Fri Apr 16 19:20:18 GMT 2004)
  • Re: causing trouble(Sat Apr 17 14:18:05 GMT 2004)
  • Re: causing trouble(Sun Apr 18 01:51:41 GMT 2004)
  • Re: causing trouble(Mon Apr 19 15:16:37 GMT 2004)
  • Re: causing trouble, active/passive(Mon Apr 19 21:10:28 GMT 2004)
  • Re: causing trouble, active/passive(Tue Apr 20 02:33:27 GMT 2004)
  • Re: causing trouble, active/passive(Tue Apr 20 20:16:28 GMT 2004)
  • Re: resolving trouble(Wed Apr 21 15:30:56 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Function, evolution, emergence, and modeling...(Fri Apr 23 15:14:44 GMT 2004)
  • Re: The other passage, as promised... (Part One)(Mon Apr 26 14:10:21 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Freeman Dyson - Godel & science as inexhaustable(Wed Apr 28 14:24:31 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Freeman Dyson - Godel & science as inexhaustable(Wed Apr 28 22:30:47 GMT 2004)
  • Re: The Goal of this List(Thu Apr 29 14:41:51 GMT 2004)
  • Re: The Goal of this List(Thu Apr 29 20:43:56 GMT 2004)
  • Re: The Goal of this List(Thu Apr 29 23:36:33 GMT 2004)
  • Re: One of the posts from the Blog Experiment on Jack Park's site(Tue May 04 01:19:41 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Fw: GM Food & Feed Not Fit for "Man or Beast"(Sun May 09 02:30:56 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Fw: GM Food & Feed Not Fit for "Man or Beast"(Sun May 09 02:42:47 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Fw: GM Food & Feed Not Fit for "Man or Beast"(Sun May 09 14:33:04 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Fw: GM Food & Feed Not Fit for "Man or Beast"(Mon May 10 15:34:34 GMT 2004)
  • Re: models - branch fromf GM discussion(Mon May 10 22:16:57 GMT 2004)
  • Re: models - branch fromf GM discussion(Wed May 12 21:19:30 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Rosennean Models, Physics, Physicists, etc...(Fri May 14 19:43:31 GMT 2004)
  • Re: models - branch fromf GM discussion(Fri May 14 20:13:59 GMT 2004)
  • Re: models, sensory perception(Fri May 14 21:53:42 GMT 2004)
  • Re: models - branch fromf GM discussion(Sat May 15 17:31:40 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Bob Rosen's models, sensory perception, and more(Sun May 16 15:55:18 GMT 2004)
  • Re: models, sensory perception(Sun May 16 19:42:57 GMT 2004)
  • Re: models, sensory perception(Tue May 18 16:06:21 GMT 2004)
  • Re: models - branch fromf GM discussion(Tue May 18 23:11:23 GMT 2004)
  • physics(Thu May 20 02:49:02 GMT 2004)
  • Re: models, sensory perception(Thu May 20 14:21:44 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Colimits was Re: models, sensory perception(Thu May 20 15:59:44 GMT 2004)
  • Re: models, sensory perception(Thu May 20 20:11:17 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Colimits was Re: models, sensory perception(Fri May 21 22:38:57 GMT 2004)