ROSEN Mailing List Archives (by Author)

• Jack Park
  • Thinking about the Rosennean challenge(Thu Jan 06 15:37:13 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Thinking about the Rosennean challenge(Thu Jan 06 17:22:37 GMT 2005)
  • Doing Science [wasRe: Inequivalence of models](Tue Jan 18 14:28:05 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Quantum Physics(Thu Jan 20 17:13:07 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Quantum Physics(Fri Jan 21 17:17:52 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Communication ...(Fri Jan 21 17:22:54 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Rosennean "Cookbook"(Fri Jan 21 23:49:54 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Rosennean "Cookbook"(Sat Jan 22 04:52:55 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Rosennean "Cookbook"(Sat Jan 22 19:00:13 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Rosennean "Cookbook"(Sat Jan 22 19:35:41 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Rosennean "Cookbook"(Sun Jan 23 15:54:10 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Rosennean "Cookbook"(Mon Jan 24 15:08:09 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Rosennean "Cookbook"(Mon Jan 24 16:41:24 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Rosennean "Cookbook"(Mon Jan 24 18:03:13 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Rosennean "Cookbook"(Mon Jan 24 22:17:18 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Rosennean "Cookbook"(Tue Jan 25 18:35:52 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Jack's Rosennean Cookbook idea...(Tue Feb 01 03:41:13 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Jack's Rosennean Cookbook idea...(Tue Feb 01 15:39:34 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Jack's Rosennean Cookbook idea...(Tue Feb 01 15:43:43 GMT 2005)
  • Re: The relevance of impredicativity(Tue Feb 01 15:50:27 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Problems for solutions(Tue Feb 01 17:54:44 GMT 2005)
  • Extreme Democracy(Tue Feb 01 22:28:23 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Reductionist philosophy(Fri Feb 04 15:22:55 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Neural Networks(Sat Oct 29 17:34:20 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Stephen Hawking is wrong(Mon Nov 28 14:47:24 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Stephen Hawking is wrong(Wed Nov 30 21:29:21 GMT 2005)
  • Re: nature as analogy(Tue Dec 27 18:51:38 GMT 2005)
  • Re: nature as analogy(Wed Dec 28 19:12:12 GMT 2005)
  • Re: nature as analogy(Thu Dec 29 20:45:53 GMT 2005)
• James N Rose
  • Is reality complex? / Redux: Free-will(Tue Nov 11 00:09:12 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Free-will(Wed Nov 12 00:54:36 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Redux: Free-will and Bali(Wed Nov 12 01:03:21 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Free-will vs. listserver(Wed Nov 12 06:28:39 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Free-will, interdependence(Thu Nov 13 03:08:30 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Free-will, interdependence(Thu Nov 13 03:45:39 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Free-will(Thu Nov 13 04:04:02 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Free-will(Thu Nov 13 09:34:53 GMT 2003)
  • Is reality complex? / Redux: Free-will(Thu Nov 13 10:52:19 GMT 2003)
  • Re: [COMPLEX-M] Free-will(Thu Nov 13 11:14:32 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Free-will/the Internet(Thu Nov 13 18:07:44 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Free-will(Fri Nov 14 06:14:31 GMT 2003)
  • 2nd Law and Ecosystems(Fri Nov 14 16:13:44 GMT 2003)
  • [COMPLEX-M] 2nd Law and Ecosystems(Fri Nov 14 16:41:07 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Free-will(Fri Nov 14 16:56:47 GMT 2003)
  • [Theory of Everything] cross-post mixup :-)(Sat Nov 15 18:49:35 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Theory of Everything(Sat Nov 15 23:57:02 GMT 2003)
  • Theory of Everything(Sun Nov 16 00:22:19 GMT 2003)
  • Re: CIA Bioweapons Threat Report(Sun Nov 16 15:52:16 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Einstein and biology(Sun Nov 16 16:58:34 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Einstein and biology(Sun Nov 16 17:02:03 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Rosen & Ashby(Mon Nov 17 03:41:34 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Rosen & Ashby(Mon Nov 17 18:20:33 GMT 2003)
  • FYINews: "Nanotubes Highly Toxic"(Tue Nov 18 16:16:56 GMT 2003)
  • Re: FYINews: "Nanotubes Highly Toxic"(Tue Nov 18 17:23:25 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Rosen & Ashby(Wed Nov 19 10:31:39 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Einstein and biology(Wed Nov 19 10:54:31 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Einstein and biology(Wed Nov 19 11:05:26 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Rosen & Ashby(Wed Nov 19 19:45:54 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Rosen & Ashby & Rose(Sat Nov 22 18:27:22 GMT 2003)
  • Re: System boundaries and science(Sun Nov 23 00:00:21 GMT 2003)
  • Re: System boundaries and science(Sun Nov 23 22:07:55 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Rosen & Ashby(Sun Nov 23 22:48:00 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Rosen & Ashby(Mon Nov 24 05:47:10 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Consciousness and death(Sun Nov 30 19:46:34 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Senescence(Mon Dec 01 00:53:05 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Senescence(Tue Dec 02 03:14:19 GMT 2003)
  • Re: SciAm Dec. 2003 - DNA, Epigenetics, and Complexity(Mon Dec 15 02:30:45 GMT 2003)
  • Re: SciAm Dec. 2003 - DNA, Epigenetics, and Complexity(Mon Dec 15 02:35:01 GMT 2003)
  • Re: mitochondrial DNA(Tue Dec 16 04:11:29 GMT 2003)
  • Re: mitochondrial DNA(Tue Dec 16 04:13:32 GMT 2003)
  • Re: mitochondrial DNA, Cobb, Ceptual Inst., $(Sun Dec 21 21:59:39 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Prion research and mad cow disease(Sat Dec 27 17:01:23 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Prion research and mad cow disease(Sat Dec 27 19:15:38 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Rosenean theory catch-22's(Wed Jan 28 14:42:39 GMT 2004)
  • after the: Landauer and Bellman critique(Sat Feb 21 16:39:04 GMT 2004)
  • Re: The Santa Fe Institute(Sat Feb 21 23:20:55 GMT 2004)
  • Triple-J ; OnLine Cell Modelling (JWS)(Thu Feb 26 15:01:30 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Triple-J ; OnLine Cell Modelling (JWS)(Fri Feb 27 15:11:01 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Rosennean ideas and better modelling...(Sun Mar 14 02:03:16 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Language expression; html vs plain text(Sun Mar 14 04:07:52 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Relational space(Sat Mar 20 18:39:28 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life?(Sat Mar 20 18:48:00 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Relational space(Sat Mar 20 23:36:41 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Life without evolution/evolution without life?(Mon Mar 22 05:56:17 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Comparing Rosennean Complexity(Wed Mar 24 15:16:01 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Comparing Rosennean Complexity(Thu Mar 25 04:57:27 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Comparing Rosennean Complexity(Fri Mar 26 04:46:47 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Fw: Nature magazine article(Sat Mar 27 16:47:11 GMT 2004)
  • Nature magazine article. review(Sat Mar 27 17:09:35 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Nature magazine article. review(Sat Mar 27 23:49:56 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems(Sun Mar 28 04:07:20 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems(Sun Mar 28 16:19:21 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Science and Religion(Sun Mar 28 16:32:59 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Mathematics in biology(Sun Mar 28 16:38:10 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems(Sun Mar 28 16:49:30 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems(Sun Mar 28 22:10:34 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Science and Religion(Sun Mar 28 23:18:26 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Howard's challenge(Mon Mar 29 15:19:33 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Science and Religion(Tue Mar 30 06:14:23 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Howard's challenge(Tue Mar 30 06:22:52 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Howard's challenge(Tue Mar 30 06:30:48 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems(Tue Mar 30 06:44:25 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Godel's Incompleteness Theorems(Tue Mar 30 15:06:25 GMT 2004)
  • Re: terminal von Neumann(Sat Apr 03 05:12:01 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Space Travel and Life "support"(Sun Apr 11 14:24:53 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Octopus blood...(Sun Apr 11 17:12:26 GMT 2004)
  • Re: causing trouble(Mon Apr 19 13:56:45 GMT 2004)
  • Re: The Goal of this List(Thu Apr 29 14:29:15 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Qualitative Dynamics, Supercategories/Meta-categories and Quantum Automata(Thu May 27 14:31:20 GMT 2004)
  • von Neumann quote(Thu Jun 10 07:15:08 GMT 2004)
  • Re: von Neumann quote(Fri Jun 11 14:33:26 GMT 2004)
  • Re: von Neumann quote(Sat Jun 12 04:38:21 GMT 2004)
  • Re: von Neumann quote(Tue Jun 15 03:45:09 GMT 2004)
  • Re: What is /are The Logic(s) of Life?... and Adjointness is Fundamental in Categories and Topoi of Biological Systems(Fri Jun 18 14:07:16 GMT 2004)
  • Re: What is /are The Logic(s) of Life?... and Adjointness is Fundamental in Categories and Topoi of Biological Systems(Wed Jun 23 03:55:06 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Other processes(Sat Jul 10 18:55:55 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Dr Mae-Wan Ho and i-sis.org " Definition in the SpaceTime of an Organism and in relation to Quantum theory?(Sat Jul 24 17:30:57 GMT 2004)
  • Re: [COMPLEX-M] Objective Knowledge, Stories and Models(Sat Jul 24 18:57:06 GMT 2004)
  • Re: [COMPLEX-M] Objective Knowledge, Stories and Models(Mon Jul 26 14:29:04 GMT 2004)
  • jpg question(Mon Aug 09 02:29:57 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Physics and Metaphysics - imminent causality(Tue Aug 10 13:39:32 GMT 2004)
  • Re: machine, organism, life(Mon Aug 23 14:21:19 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Which part of the brain is conscious?(Fri Dec 10 15:15:30 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Anyone up to a Rosennean challenge?(Wed Jan 05 05:08:42 GMT 2005)
  • Why ignore the 'unknown or non-obvious?(Fri Jan 07 15:39:19 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Why ignore the 'unknown or non-obvious?(Sat Jan 08 01:32:16 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Why ignore the 'unknown or non-obvious?(Mon Jan 10 01:47:38 GMT 2005)
  • "alien"/alternate perspectives (science & models)(Tue Jan 18 14:26:07 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Inequivalence of models(Wed Jan 19 15:15:37 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Inequivalence of models(Thu Jan 20 13:53:14 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Inequivalence of models(Thu Jan 20 15:09:06 GMT 2005)
  • Communication ...(Fri Jan 21 14:44:38 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Communication ...(Fri Jan 21 15:10:22 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Communication ...(Sat Jan 22 08:07:43 GMT 2005)
  • information/vagueness.(Sun Jan 23 19:18:55 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Rosen, Kauffman and compatibility(Wed Jan 26 15:56:01 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Rosen, Kauffman and compatibility(Thu Jan 27 04:19:17 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Robert Rosen's working notes...(Sat Feb 05 06:31:03 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Robert Rosen's working notes...(Sat Feb 05 15:29:24 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Robert Rosen's working notes...(Sun Feb 06 03:13:07 GMT 2005)
  • Tim on ..Robert Rosen's working notes...(Tue Feb 08 15:34:38 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Causality vs Entailment(Wed Mar 23 14:56:45 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Causality vs Entailment -typo fixed(Wed Mar 23 15:02:47 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Nature Essay: Physics, Complexity and Causality(Fri Jun 10 01:32:33 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Getting to know you(Wed Jun 22 13:16:11 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Getting to know you, Dr. Watson...(Thu Jun 23 01:19:28 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Clear Dichotomy(Sat Jul 02 15:19:21 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Clear Dichotomy (fixed typos)(Sat Jul 02 15:56:44 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Description of evolution(Sun Jul 03 10:11:38 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Description of evolution(Sun Jul 03 16:25:44 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Description of evolution(Mon Jul 04 02:09:29 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Description of evolution(Mon Jul 04 16:02:11 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Description of evolution(Wed Jul 06 01:34:11 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Judith's mathematical insight...(Mon Aug 15 14:17:01 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Judith's mathematical insight...(Tue Aug 16 14:28:19 GMT 2005)
  • Re: The "Relational Complexity" Reference Library of Dr. Robert Rosen...(Sat Aug 20 18:16:19 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Dynamical Hierarchies(Sun Oct 09 04:10:42 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Dynamical Hierarchies(Sun Oct 09 16:26:33 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Dynamical Hierarchies(Mon Oct 17 00:35:35 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Natural Law and Dynamical Hierarchies(Thu Oct 20 13:37:18 GMT 2005)
  • Re: A combination of relational thinking and reductionist capability at work?(Fri Oct 28 19:51:12 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Interesting analogies...(Sat Nov 05 03:28:52 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Interesting analogies...(Sat Nov 05 15:01:23 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Interesting analogies...(Sat Nov 05 16:40:35 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Interesting analogies...(Sun Nov 06 19:06:00 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Interesting analogies...(Mon Nov 07 04:46:34 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Interesting analogies...(Tue Nov 08 05:25:57 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Interesting analogies...(Tue Nov 08 05:36:55 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Reactive vs. Anticipatory in adaptation/evolution(Tue Nov 08 15:24:32 GMT 2005)
  • Re: inertial and gravitational(Tue Nov 15 15:02:54 GMT 2005)
  • Re: [mirai] INTELLIGENT DESIGN VS. DARWIN(Sat Nov 19 16:47:07 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Intelligent Design vs. Darwin(Sun Nov 20 22:10:31 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Intelligent Design vs. Darwin(Mon Nov 21 02:15:08 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Intelligent Design vs. Darwin(Mon Nov 21 03:39:03 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Intelligent Design vs. Darwin(Tue Nov 22 03:08:27 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Intelligent Design vs. Darwin(Wed Nov 23 15:20:05 GMT 2005)
  • Design vs. Darwin - aside line(Fri Nov 25 02:08:32 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Theory vs Experimental Science(Sun Nov 27 18:47:28 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Design vs. Darwin - aside line(Mon Nov 28 04:09:44 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Will this be useful?(Wed Nov 30 15:23:30 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Modeling relations and semantics(Mon Dec 05 15:27:37 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Modeling relations and semantics: "Blame" and causality(Mon Dec 12 00:04:44 GMT 2005)
• jamikes
  • Re: Aristotle and material causation(Sun Jun 19 21:46:22 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Material causation vs material entailment(Mon Jun 20 15:00:06 GMT 2005)
  • Blanked out(Tue Jun 21 15:15:23 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Getting to know you(Wed Jun 22 02:02:26 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Getting to know you(Thu Jun 23 20:45:16 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Getting to know you, contradictions(Fri Jun 24 20:06:16 GMT 2005)
  • evolution?(Sun Jul 03 03:51:33 GMT 2005)
  • Re: Description of evolution(Mon Jul 04 12:31:59 GMT 2005)
• Jannie Hofmeyr
  • Re: Part III, Rosen's "Autographical Reminiscences"(Wed Jun 18 15:45:04 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Autopoiesis ....and how it is analogous to Rosennean Complexity(Thu Jul 31 21:58:05 GMT 2003)
  • Re: Autopoiesis ....and how it is analogous to Rosennean Complexity(Thu Jul 31 22:14:18 GMT 2003)
  • Paper by Landauer and Bellman(Wed Feb 18 21:23:02 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Landauer and Bellman critique(Thu Feb 19 21:23:13 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Paper by Landauer and Bellman(Thu Feb 26 04:36:48 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Paper by Landauer and Bellman(Thu Feb 26 20:03:51 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Triple-J ; OnLine Cell Modelling (JWS)(Fri Feb 27 08:36:19 GMT 2004)
  • Re: Triple-J ; OnLine Cell Modelling (JWS)(Sun Feb 29 11:47:17 GMT 2004)
  • Re: modelling metabolism(Mon Mar 01 07:06:00 GMT 2004)